Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu 2: T Domka | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | B Nalazek-A Drzewiecki,*-Z Łach | 1 | WE | 7![]() | W | ![]() | = | +1510 | 81.25% | 81.25% | ||
B Nalazek-A Drzewiecki,*-Z Łach | 2 | WE | 5![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | -300 | 43.00% | 62.12% | |||
2 | B Nalazek-*,Z Łach-A Drzewiecki | 3 | NS | 2![]() | N | ![]() | = | +110 | 43.75% | 56.00% | ||
B Nalazek-*,Z Łach-A Drzewiecki | 4 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 49.23% | |||
3 | B Nalazek-Z Łach,A Drzewiecki-* | 5 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | -100 | 18.75% | 43.14% | ||
B Nalazek-Z Łach,A Drzewiecki-* | 6 | WE | 6![]() | N | ![]() | = | -990 | 6.25% | 36.99% | |||
4 | M Jakubowski-W Paczkowski,*-C Kołaczyński | 11 | WE | 5![]() | E | ![]() | = | +400 | 50.00% | 38.85% | ||
M Jakubowski-W Paczkowski,*-C Kołaczyński | 12 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | -600 | 31.25% | 37.90% | |||
5 | C Kołaczyński-W Paczkowski,M Jakubowski-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | +870 | 100.00% | 44.80% | ||
C Kołaczyński-W Paczkowski,M Jakubowski-* | 8 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | +150 | 43.75% | 44.69% | |||
6 | *-W Paczkowski,C Kołaczyński-M Jakubowski | 9 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | -660 | 31.25% | 43.47% | ||
*-W Paczkowski,C Kołaczyński-M Jakubowski | 10 | NS | 5![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | +640 | 81.25% | 46.62% | |||
7 | E Jaworski-H Pientka,*-A Ciechacki | 15 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 87.50% | 49.76% | ||
E Jaworski-H Pientka,*-A Ciechacki | 16 | WE | 1![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 31.25% | 48.44% | |||
8 | H Pientka-*,E Jaworski-A Ciechacki | 17 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | -300 | 0.00% | 45.21% | ||
H Pientka-*,E Jaworski-A Ciechacki | 18 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -400 | 68.75% | 46.68% | |||
9 | *-E Jaworski,H Pientka-A Ciechacki | 13 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -200 | 37.50% | 46.14% | ||
*-E Jaworski,H Pientka-A Ciechacki | 14 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | = | +420 | 31.25% | 45.32% | |||
10 | *-I Smyk,W Giżyński-S Dankowski | 21 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 93.75% | 47.87% | ||
*-I Smyk,W Giżyński-S Dankowski | 22 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 56.25% | 48.28% | |||
11 | I Smyk-W Giżyński,*-S Dankowski | 23 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -630 | 71.06% | 49.37% | ||
I Smyk-W Giżyński,*-S Dankowski | 24 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | -400 | 71.06% | 50.36% | |||
12 | W Giżyński-*,I Smyk-S Dankowski | 19 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | -150 | 25.00% | 49.25% | ||
W Giżyński-*,I Smyk-S Dankowski | 20 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | = | -110 | 37.50% | 48.76% | |||
13 | P Litwin-*,J Jurski-E Seichter | 29 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 6.25% | 47.06% | ||
P Litwin-*,J Jurski-E Seichter | 30 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | = | -110 | 0.00% | 45.25% | |||
14 | E Seichter-*,P Litwin-J Jurski | 25 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 37.50% | 44.97% | ||
E Seichter-*,P Litwin-J Jurski | 26 | NS | 6![]() | E | ![]() | = | -1370 | 50.00% | 45.15% | |||
15 | J Jurski-*,E Seichter-P Litwin | 27 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -4 | +200 | 37.50% | 44.88% | ||
J Jurski-*,E Seichter-P Litwin | 28 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | +680 | 18.75% | 44.01% | |||
SUMA: | 44.01% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 44.01% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 31 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-12-16 o 22:51:06