Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu 6: H Pientka | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | W Paczkowski-S Dankowski,J Jurski-* | 3 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | -1 | +50 | 75.00% | 75.00% | ||
W Paczkowski-S Dankowski,J Jurski-* | 4 | WE | 4× | W | K | -2 | -500 | 0.81% | 37.91% | |||
2 | S Dankowski-J Jurski,W Paczkowski-* | 5 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | -3 | +300 | 100.00% | 58.60% | ||
S Dankowski-J Jurski,W Paczkowski-* | 6 | WE | 6 | N | Q | +1 | -940 | 43.75% | 54.89% | |||
3 | J Jurski-W Paczkowski,S Dankowski-* | 1 | WE | 7 | W | 5 | = | +1510 | 81.25% | 60.16% | ||
J Jurski-W Paczkowski,S Dankowski-* | 2 | WE | APP | 60.00% | 60.14% | |||||||
4 | B Nalazek-E Seichter,W Giżyński-* | 7 | WE | 3 | S | 3 | -1 | +100 | 6.25% | 52.44% | ||
B Nalazek-E Seichter,W Giżyński-* | 8 | WE | 1 | W | 5 | +2 | +150 | 43.75% | 51.35% | |||
5 | B Nalazek-W Giżyński,*-E Seichter | 9 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | = | +620 | 25.00% | 48.42% | ||
B Nalazek-W Giżyński,*-E Seichter | 10 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | +3 | -170 | 93.75% | 52.96% | |||
6 | B Nalazek-*,E Seichter-W Giżyński | 11 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | +2 | -460 | 6.25% | 48.71% | ||
B Nalazek-*,E Seichter-W Giżyński | 12 | NS | 4 | N | 10 | -2 | -200 | 6.25% | 45.17% | |||
7 | E Jaworski-*,T Domka-A Ciechacki | 15 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | -1 | +50 | 12.50% | 42.66% | ||
E Jaworski-*,T Domka-A Ciechacki | 16 | NS | 1 | N | 5 | -1 | -50 | 68.75% | 44.52% | |||
8 | *-T Domka,E Jaworski-A Ciechacki | 17 | NS | 4× | S | 3 | -2 | -300 | 0.00% | 41.55% | ||
*-T Domka,E Jaworski-A Ciechacki | 18 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | = | -400 | 68.75% | 43.25% | |||
9 | T Domka-E Jaworski,*-A Ciechacki | 13 | WE | 2× | S | 8 | -1 | +200 | 62.50% | 44.39% | ||
T Domka-E Jaworski,*-A Ciechacki | 14 | WE | 4 | S | J | = | -420 | 68.75% | 45.74% | |||
10 | *-P Litwin,M Jakubowski-Z Łach | 19 | NS | 3 | W | A | = | -140 | 37.50% | 45.31% | ||
*-P Litwin,M Jakubowski-Z Łach | 20 | NS | 3 | N | K | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 43.04% | |||
11 | Z Łach-*,M Jakubowski-P Litwin | 21 | NS | 4 | W | 8 | = | -420 | 18.75% | 41.88% | ||
Z Łach-*,M Jakubowski-P Litwin | 22 | NS | 6× | N | A | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 39.98% | |||
12 | P Litwin-Z Łach,M Jakubowski-* | 23 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | +4 | -720 | 50.00% | 40.42% | ||
P Litwin-Z Łach,M Jakubowski-* | 24 | WE | 3 | S | K | +1 | -430 | 28.94% | 39.94% | |||
13 | I Smyk-C Kołaczyński,A Drzewiecki-* | 25 | WE | 4× | E | Q | -3 | -800 | 0.00% | 38.34% | ||
I Smyk-C Kołaczyński,A Drzewiecki-* | 26 | WE | 5 | W | K | +1 | +680 | 6.25% | 37.11% | |||
14 | *-I Smyk,A Drzewiecki-C Kołaczyński | 27 | NS | 3× | W | A | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 39.44% | ||
*-I Smyk,A Drzewiecki-C Kołaczyński | 28 | NS | 4 | S | K | +2 | +680 | 18.75% | 38.70% | |||
15 | C Kołaczyński-*,A Drzewiecki-I Smyk | 29 | NS | 2 | N | J | +2 | +170 | 56.25% | 39.30% | ||
C Kołaczyński-*,A Drzewiecki-I Smyk | 30 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | -3 | +150 | 93.75% | 41.12% | |||
SUMA: | 41.12% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 41.12% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 34 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2012-12-16 o 22:51:06