59: H Pientka
rakt
bieżący
K
2
Q
J102A×210×A×J77A7227Q×44A2K8Q58A5| Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu 59: H Pientka | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | M Kuśmierek-W Kamiński,M Łaniewski-* | 17 | WE | 3 | W | K | -1 | -50 | 30.00% | 30.00% | ||
| M Kuśmierek-W Kamiński,M Łaniewski-* | 18 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | = | +400 | 60.00% | 45.00% | |||
| 2 | *-W Kamiński,M Kuśmierek-M Łaniewski | 13 | NS | 3 | S | Q | -1 | -100 | 35.43% | 41.81% | ||
| *-W Kamiński,M Kuśmierek-M Łaniewski | 14 | NS | 1 | E | J | = | -90 | 57.88% | 45.82% | |||
| 3 | M Łaniewski-W Kamiński,*-M Kuśmierek | 15 | WE | 4 | E | 10 | -3 | -150 | 35.00% | 43.66% | ||
| M Łaniewski-W Kamiński,*-M Kuśmierek | 16 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | -2 | -200 | 17.50% | 39.30% | |||
| 4 | K Ligęza-T Żurek,*-B Radko | 19 | WE | 3 | E | A | = | +140 | 89.38% | 46.45% | ||
| K Ligęza-T Żurek,*-B Radko | 20 | WE | 3× | W | 2 | -3 | -800 | 0.13% | 40.66% | |||
| 5 | B Radko-K Ligęza,*-T Żurek | 21 | WE | 4 | S | 10 | +1 | -650 | 40.00% | 40.59% | ||
| B Radko-K Ligęza,*-T Żurek | 22 | WE | 4× | S | A | -1 | +100 | 70.00% | 43.53% | |||
| 6 | T Żurek-B Radko,*-K Ligęza | 23 | WE | 4× | S | J | -1 | +200 | 82.50% | 47.07% | ||
| T Żurek-B Radko,*-K Ligęza | 24 | WE | 4 | S | 7 | = | -420 | 40.00% | 46.48% | |||
| 7 | T Domka-*,A Krzemińska-M Dampc | 25 | NS | 2 | S | 7 | -1 | -50 | 50.00% | 46.75% | ||
| T Domka-*,A Krzemińska-M Dampc | 26 | NS | 5 | N | A | = | +600 | 50.00% | 46.99% | |||
| 8 | T Domka-A Krzemińska,M Dampc-* | 27 | WE | 2 | S | 7 | = | -110 | 30.00% | 45.85% | ||
| T Domka-A Krzemińska,M Dampc-* | 28 | WE | 1 | E | 2 | +1 | +120 | 47.50% | 45.96% | |||
| 9 | T Domka-M Dampc,*-A Krzemińska | 29 | WE | 2 | S | 2 | +2 | -130 | 17.50% | 44.28% | ||
| T Domka-M Dampc,*-A Krzemińska | 30 | WE | 3 | W | 7 | +1 | +430 | 67.50% | 45.57% | |||
| 10 | M Bielski-*,W Danilczuk-L Łaniewski | 1 | NS | 1 | N | Q | +2 | +150 | 82.50% | 47.52% | ||
| M Bielski-*,W Danilczuk-L Łaniewski | 2 | NS | 4× | E | 4 | -2 | +300 | 75.00% | 48.89% | |||
| 11 | L Łaniewski-M Bielski,W Danilczuk-* | 3 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | +3 | -490 | 32.50% | 48.11% | ||
| L Łaniewski-M Bielski,W Danilczuk-* | 4 | WE | 1 | N | A | +1 | -110 | 5.00% | 46.15% | |||
| 12 | *-L Łaniewski,W Danilczuk-M Bielski | 5 | NS | 3 | W | 2 | -3 | +150 | 90.00% | 48.06% | ||
| *-L Łaniewski,W Danilczuk-M Bielski | 6 | NS | 3 | W | K | = | -600 | 7.50% | 46.37% | |||
| 13 | *-R Mrukowski,M Dolny-F Szafranek | 11 | NS | 4 | S | 8 | = | +420 | 30.00% | 45.71% | ||
| *-R Mrukowski,M Dolny-F Szafranek | 12 | NS | 4 | S | Q | +2 | +680 | 27.50% | 45.01% | |||
| 14 | F Szafranek-R Mrukowski,*-M Dolny | 7 | WE | 1 | W | 5 | = | +90 | 77.50% | 46.21% | ||
| F Szafranek-R Mrukowski,*-M Dolny | 8 | WE | 4 | N | 8 | = | -420 | 65.00% | 46.89% | |||
| 15 | M Dolny-R Mrukowski,F Szafranek-* | 9 | WE | 5 | S | A | -1 | +50 | 60.50% | 47.36% | ||
| M Dolny-R Mrukowski,F Szafranek-* | 10 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | -2 | -200 | 22.50% | 46.53% | |||
| SUMA: | 46.53% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 46.53% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 62 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2016-12-18 o 15:54:01