Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu 20: M Dolny | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | B Radko-J Piwoński,E Seichter-* | 25 | WE | 2 | W | 7 | +1 | +140 | 32.14% | 32.14% | ||
B Radko-J Piwoński,E Seichter-* | 26 | WE | 4 | W | 10 | -1 | -100 | 21.43% | 26.79% | |||
2 | B Radko-E Seichter,*-J Piwoński | 27 | WE | PASS | 0 | 46.43% | 33.33% | |||||
B Radko-E Seichter,*-J Piwoński | 28 | WE | 1 | E | 4 | -3 | -150 | 39.29% | 34.82% | |||
3 | B Radko-*,J Piwoński-E Seichter | 29 | NS | 2 | S | 9 | -1 | -100 | 7.14% | 29.29% | ||
B Radko-*,J Piwoński-E Seichter | 30 | NS | 5 | W | 7 | -3 | +150 | 100.00% | 41.07% | |||
4 | M Dahms-Z Zachwieja,W Paczkowski-* | 19 | WE | 2 | W | 6 | +2 | +170 | 64.29% | 44.39% | ||
M Dahms-Z Zachwieja,W Paczkowski-* | 20 | WE | 6 | E | A | +1 | +1460 | 92.86% | 50.45% | |||
5 | M Dahms-W Paczkowski,*-Z Zachwieja | 21 | WE | 1 | S | 6 | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 55.95% | ||
M Dahms-W Paczkowski,*-Z Zachwieja | 22 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | +2 | -460 | 50.00% | 55.36% | |||
6 | M Dahms-*,Z Zachwieja-W Paczkowski | 23 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | +1 | +630 | 35.71% | 53.57% | ||
M Dahms-*,Z Zachwieja-W Paczkowski | 24 | NS | 2× | S | 5 | -1 | -100 | 28.57% | 51.49% | |||
7 | T Wasilewski-B Drews,M Lewiński-* | 13 | WE | 1 | W | 4 | +4 | +200 | 28.57% | 49.73% | ||
T Wasilewski-B Drews,M Lewiński-* | 14 | WE | 2 | E | Q | -2 | -100 | 14.29% | 47.19% | |||
8 | T Wasilewski-M Lewiński,*-B Drews | 15 | WE | 5 | E | 5 | -2 | -100 | 0.00% | 44.05% | ||
T Wasilewski-M Lewiński,*-B Drews | 16 | WE | 1 | N | 5 | +1 | -120 | 71.43% | 45.76% | |||
9 | T Wasilewski-*,B Drews-M Lewiński | 17 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | -450 | 25.00% | 44.54% | ||
T Wasilewski-*,B Drews-M Lewiński | 18 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | -1 | +50 | 64.29% | 45.63% | |||
10 | D Kaszowski-J Kowalski,T Szwenkel-* | 7 | WE | 5 | S | 2 | +1 | -620 | 10.71% | 43.80% | ||
D Kaszowski-J Kowalski,T Szwenkel-* | 8 | WE | 4 | N | K | -2 | +100 | 71.43% | 45.18% | |||
11 | D Kaszowski-T Szwenkel,*-J Kowalski | 9 | WE | 4 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 75.00% | 46.60% | ||
D Kaszowski-T Szwenkel,*-J Kowalski | 10 | WE | 3 | W | 5 | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 45.62% | |||
12 | D Kaszowski-*,J Kowalski-T Szwenkel | 11 | NS | 4 | S | A | -2 | -100 | 57.14% | 46.12% | ||
D Kaszowski-*,J Kowalski-T Szwenkel | 12 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | +2 | -460 | 42.86% | 45.98% | |||
13 | T Borucki-E Poselt,G Gralik-* | 1 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | -1 | -50 | 53.57% | 46.29% | ||
T Borucki-E Poselt,G Gralik-* | 2 | WE | 3× | S | A | -1 | +200 | 92.86% | 48.08% | |||
14 | T Borucki-G Gralik,*-E Poselt | 3 | WE | 6 | E | J | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 46.30% | ||
T Borucki-G Gralik,*-E Poselt | 4 | WE | 2 | W | Q | +4 | +230 | 14.29% | 45.15% | |||
15 | T Borucki-*,E Poselt-G Gralik | 5 | NS | 1 | N | 4 | -1 | -100 | 39.29% | 44.95% | ||
T Borucki-*,E Poselt-G Gralik | 6 | NS | 5 | E | A | -2 | +200 | 64.29% | 45.60% | |||
SUMA: | 45.60% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 45.60% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 44 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-12-17 o 14:50:42