4: D Kaszowski
rakt
bieżący
2
2
K
4232K258A5K7Q5K2KQ5A57K5K2×6| Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu 4: D Kaszowski | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | *-E Poselt,M Lewiński-R Rychlicki | 19 | NS | 4 | W | 2 | -1 | +100 | 85.71% | 85.71% | ||
| *-E Poselt,M Lewiński-R Rychlicki | 20 | NS | 6 | W | 2 | = | -1430 | 21.43% | 53.57% | |||
| 2 | *-M Lewiński,R Rychlicki-E Poselt | 21 | NS | 3 | E | K | -3 | +150 | 100.00% | 69.05% | ||
| *-M Lewiński,R Rychlicki-E Poselt | 22 | NS | 3 | N | 4 | +2 | +460 | 50.00% | 64.29% | |||
| 3 | *-R Rychlicki,E Poselt-M Lewiński | 23 | NS | 3 | N | 2 | +1 | +630 | 35.71% | 58.57% | ||
| *-R Rychlicki,E Poselt-M Lewiński | 24 | NS | 3 | W | 3 | = | -110 | 17.86% | 51.79% | |||
| 4 | *-B Drews,G Gralik-A Lewandowski | 25 | NS | 2 | W | 2 | +2 | -170 | 46.43% | 51.02% | ||
| *-B Drews,G Gralik-A Lewandowski | 26 | NS | 3 | W | K | +3 | -690 | 0.00% | 44.64% | |||
| 5 | *-G Gralik,A Lewandowski-B Drews | 27 | NS | 1 | S | 2 | +3 | +170 | 89.29% | 49.60% | ||
| *-G Gralik,A Lewandowski-B Drews | 28 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | = | +140 | 39.29% | 48.57% | |||
| 6 | *-A Lewandowski,B Drews-G Gralik | 29 | NS | 3 | N | 8 | = | +600 | 75.00% | 50.97% | ||
| *-A Lewandowski,B Drews-G Gralik | 30 | NS | 6 | W | A | +1 | -1010 | 39.29% | 50.00% | |||
| 7 | *-J Piwoński,W Paczkowski-S Łański | 1 | NS | 5 | E | 5 | -2 | +100 | 75.00% | 51.92% | ||
| *-J Piwoński,W Paczkowski-S Łański | 2 | NS | 4 | S | K | -1 | -100 | 35.71% | 50.77% | |||
| 8 | *-W Paczkowski,S Łański-J Piwoński | 3 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | = | -600 | 75.00% | 52.38% | ||
| *-W Paczkowski,S Łański-J Piwoński | 4 | NS | 6 | W | Q | = | -1430 | 10.71% | 49.78% | |||
| 9 | *-S Łański,J Piwoński-W Paczkowski | 5 | NS | 1 | S | 5 | = | +90 | 92.86% | 52.31% | ||
| *-S Łański,J Piwoński-W Paczkowski | 6 | NS | 5 | E | K | -1 | +100 | 42.86% | 51.79% | |||
| 10 | *-J Kowalski,T Szwenkel-M Dolny | 7 | NS | 5 | S | 2 | +1 | +620 | 89.29% | 53.76% | ||
| *-J Kowalski,T Szwenkel-M Dolny | 8 | NS | 4 | N | K | -2 | -100 | 28.57% | 52.50% | |||
| 11 | *-T Szwenkel,M Dolny-J Kowalski | 9 | NS | 4 | S | Q | -1 | -50 | 25.00% | 51.19% | ||
| *-T Szwenkel,M Dolny-J Kowalski | 10 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 52.27% | |||
| 12 | *-M Dolny,J Kowalski-T Szwenkel | 11 | NS | 4 | S | A | -2 | -100 | 57.14% | 52.48% | ||
| *-M Dolny,J Kowalski-T Szwenkel | 12 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | +2 | -460 | 42.86% | 52.08% | |||
| 13 | *-Z Zachwieja,E Seichter-M Stanek | 13 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | +1 | -630 | 28.57% | 51.14% | ||
| *-Z Zachwieja,E Seichter-M Stanek | 14 | NS | 3 | N | K | -1 | -50 | 25.00% | 50.14% | |||
| 14 | *-E Seichter,M Stanek-Z Zachwieja | 15 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | +2 | -460 | 78.57% | 51.19% | ||
| *-E Seichter,M Stanek-Z Zachwieja | 16 | NS | 2 | N | K | +2 | +130 | 60.71% | 51.53% | |||
| 15 | *-M Stanek,Z Zachwieja-E Seichter | 17 | NS | 4 | E | 2 | +1 | -450 | 25.00% | 50.62% | ||
| *-M Stanek,Z Zachwieja-E Seichter | 18 | NS | 3× | E | 6 | -1 | +100 | 92.86% | 52.02% | |||
| SUMA: | 52.02% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 52.02% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 26 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-12-17 o 14:50:42