36 TURNIEJ O MISTRZOSTWO POWIATU INOWROCŁAWSKIEGO 15: E Kozicki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | B Nalazek-*,E Guziołek-W Zieliński | 25 | NS | 1 | E | A | -3 | +300 | 75.00% | 75.00% | ||
B Nalazek-*,E Guziołek-W Zieliński | 26 | NS | 3× | E | 4 | = | -750 | 0.00% | 37.50% | |||
2 | B Nalazek-E Guziołek,W Zieliński-* | 27 | WE | 2 | S | K | = | -110 | 37.50% | 37.50% | ||
B Nalazek-E Guziołek,W Zieliński-* | 28 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | = | -110 | 37.50% | 37.50% | |||
3 | B Nalazek-W Zieliński,*-E Guziołek | 29 | WE | 4 | N | 6 | -2 | +200 | 87.50% | 47.50% | ||
B Nalazek-W Zieliński,*-E Guziołek | 30 | WE | 3 | W | 4 | = | +140 | 75.00% | 52.08% | |||
4 | M Kaczan-*,I Smyk-T Bykowski | 13 | NS | 3 | S | J | = | +140 | 75.00% | 55.36% | ||
M Kaczan-*,I Smyk-T Bykowski | 14 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | = | -140 | 0.00% | 48.44% | |||
5 | M Kaczan-I Smyk,T Bykowski-* | 15 | WE | 1 | S | K | +2 | -150 | 25.00% | 45.83% | ||
M Kaczan-I Smyk,T Bykowski-* | 16 | WE | 1 | E | A | -2 | -200 | 62.50% | 47.50% | |||
6 | M Kaczan-T Bykowski,*-I Smyk | 17 | WE | 4 | E | 7 | +1 | +450 | 100.00% | 52.27% | ||
M Kaczan-T Bykowski,*-I Smyk | 18 | WE | 3 | W | 6 | +1 | +430 | 87.50% | 55.21% | |||
7 | S Gąsiorowski-*,A Grela-P Litwin | 1 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | +430 | 62.50% | 55.77% | ||
S Gąsiorowski-*,A Grela-P Litwin | 2 | NS | 2× | N | J | -1 | -200 | 25.00% | 53.57% | |||
8 | S Gąsiorowski-A Grela,P Litwin-* | 3 | WE | 6 | S | 3 | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 56.67% | ||
S Gąsiorowski-A Grela,P Litwin-* | 4 | WE | 1 | E | 4 | = | +90 | 0.00% | 53.13% | |||
9 | S Gąsiorowski-P Litwin,*-A Grela | 5 | WE | 6 | W | 10 | +1 | +1010 | 12.50% | 50.74% | ||
S Gąsiorowski-P Litwin,*-A Grela | 6 | WE | 6 | W | A | = | +1430 | 100.00% | 53.47% | |||
10 | R Mrukowski-*,J Kurnik-S Cieślewicz | 19 | NS | 2 | E | 3 | +5 | -190 | 100.00% | 55.92% | ||
R Mrukowski-*,J Kurnik-S Cieślewicz | 20 | NS | 3 | W | 2 | = | -140 | 37.50% | 55.00% | |||
11 | R Mrukowski-J Kurnik,S Cieślewicz-* | 21 | WE | 2× | S | 8 | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 57.14% | ||
R Mrukowski-J Kurnik,S Cieślewicz-* | 22 | WE | 3 | S | 8 | = | -140 | 62.50% | 57.39% | |||
12 | R Mrukowski-S Cieślewicz,*-J Kurnik | 23 | WE | 3 | E | 3 | -3 | -300 | 0.00% | 54.89% | ||
R Mrukowski-S Cieślewicz,*-J Kurnik | 24 | WE | 2× | E | 3 | = | +470 | 100.00% | 56.77% | |||
13 | G Prusak-T Domka,H Nowak-* | 7 | WE | 6 | S | A | -2 | +200 | 100.00% | 58.50% | ||
G Prusak-T Domka,H Nowak-* | 8 | WE | 5× | E | A | -1 | -100 | 62.50% | 58.65% | |||
14 | *-G Prusak,H Nowak-T Domka | 9 | NS | 2 | N | A | = | +90 | 25.00% | 57.41% | ||
*-G Prusak,H Nowak-T Domka | 10 | NS | 2 | S | Q | +1 | +140 | 62.50% | 57.59% | |||
15 | T Domka-*,H Nowak-G Prusak | 11 | NS | 4 | S | 6 | = | +420 | 50.00% | 57.33% | ||
T Domka-*,H Nowak-G Prusak | 12 | NS | 2 | N | Q | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 57.08% | |||
SUMA: | 57.08% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 57.08% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 1 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2017-09-11 o 10:52:29