Turniej Indywidualny 1: T Borucki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | E Seichter-*,M Graczkowski-R Rychlicki | 1 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 31.25% | 31.25% | ||
E Seichter-*,M Graczkowski-R Rychlicki | 2 | NS | 5![]() | E | ![]() | = | -400 | 50.00% | 40.63% | |||
2 | E Seichter-M Graczkowski,R Rychlicki-* | 3 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -3 | -800 | 0.00% | 27.08% | ||
E Seichter-M Graczkowski,R Rychlicki-* | 4 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +650 | 68.75% | 37.50% | |||
3 | E Seichter-R Rychlicki,*-M Graczkowski | 5 | WE | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | +800 | 87.50% | 47.50% | ||
E Seichter-R Rychlicki,*-M Graczkowski | 6 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | -3 | -800 | 18.75% | 42.71% | |||
4 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,E Poselt-J Nawrocki | 7 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -600 | 56.25% | 44.64% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,E Poselt-J Nawrocki | 8 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | +100 | 93.75% | 50.78% | |||
5 | J Nawrocki-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Poselt-* | 9 | WE | 4![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 47.92% | ||
J Nawrocki-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Poselt-* | 10 | WE | 6![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -1460 | 62.50% | 49.38% | |||
6 | *-J Nawrocki,E Poselt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 11 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -170 | 33.94% | 47.97% | ||
*-J Nawrocki,E Poselt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 12 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 28.94% | 46.39% | |||
7 | *-E Kubiak,J Jurski-D Wilcz | 17 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +490 | 100.00% | 50.51% | ||
*-E Kubiak,J Jurski-D Wilcz | 18 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -140 | 18.75% | 48.24% | |||
8 | D Wilcz-E Kubiak,*-J Jurski | 13 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -660 | 87.50% | 50.86% | ||
D Wilcz-E Kubiak,*-J Jurski | 14 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +170 | 25.00% | 49.24% | |||
9 | J Jurski-E Kubiak,D Wilcz-* | 15 | WE | 1![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | -100 | 21.88% | 47.63% | ||
J Jurski-E Kubiak,D Wilcz-* | 16 | WE | 1![]() | E | ![]() | = | +80 | 14.87% | 45.81% | |||
10 | A Gregorowicz-L Falkowski,P Urbański-* | 23 | WE | 1![]() | N | ![]() | = | -90 | 62.50% | 46.69% | ||
A Gregorowicz-L Falkowski,P Urbański-* | 24 | WE | 1![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | -180 | 62.50% | 47.48% | |||
11 | *-L Falkowski,A Gregorowicz-P Urbański | 19 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 87.50% | 49.39% | ||
*-L Falkowski,A Gregorowicz-P Urbański | 20 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | +600 | 93.75% | 51.40% | |||
12 | P Urbański-L Falkowski,*-A Gregorowicz | 21 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | -230 | 37.50% | 50.80% | ||
P Urbański-L Falkowski,*-A Gregorowicz | 22 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 62.50% | 51.29% | |||
13 | R Kaniewski-J Kowalski,*-R Jaworski | 25 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +630 | 92.19% | 52.92% | ||
R Kaniewski-J Kowalski,*-R Jaworski | 26 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | -660 | 50.00% | 52.81% | |||
14 | R Jaworski-R Kaniewski,*-J Kowalski | 27 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +690 | 100.00% | 54.56% | ||
R Jaworski-R Kaniewski,*-J Kowalski | 28 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | +200 | 93.75% | 55.96% | |||
15 | J Kowalski-R Jaworski,*-R Kaniewski | 29 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +680 | 50.00% | 55.75% | ||
J Kowalski-R Jaworski,*-R Kaniewski | 30 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 62.50% | 55.98% | |||
SUMA: | 55.98% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 55.98% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 6 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48