Turniej Indywidualny 10: J Kowalski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-J Jurski,L Falkowski-E Poselt | 5 | NS | 3 | E | 4 | +2 | -460 | 56.25% | 56.25% | ||
*-J Jurski,L Falkowski-E Poselt | 6 | NS | 4 | S | 6 | +1 | +450 | 37.50% | 46.88% | |||
2 | E Poselt-J Jurski,*-L Falkowski | 1 | WE | 5 | W | 6 | = | +450 | 68.75% | 54.17% | ||
E Poselt-J Jurski,*-L Falkowski | 2 | WE | 6 | E | 6 | -2 | -100 | 6.25% | 42.19% | |||
3 | L Falkowski-J Jurski,E Poselt-* | 3 | WE | 2 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 45.00% | ||
L Falkowski-J Jurski,E Poselt-* | 4 | WE | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | +650 | 68.75% | 48.96% | |||
4 | D Wilcz-P Urbański,M Graczkowski-* | 11 | WE | 2 | W | A | +2 | +170 | 66.06% | 51.40% | ||
D Wilcz-P Urbański,M Graczkowski-* | 12 | WE | 2 | S | 7 | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 48.59% | |||
5 | *-P Urbański,D Wilcz-M Graczkowski | 7 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | = | -600 | 56.25% | 49.44% | ||
*-P Urbański,D Wilcz-M Graczkowski | 8 | NS | 3 | W | 4 | +1 | -130 | 50.00% | 49.50% | |||
6 | M Graczkowski-P Urbański,*-D Wilcz | 9 | WE | 2 | S | Q | = | -110 | 0.00% | 45.00% | ||
M Graczkowski-P Urbański,*-D Wilcz | 10 | WE | 7 | N | 10 | = | -2210 | 31.25% | 43.85% | |||
7 | R Rychlicki-A Gregorowicz,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 13 | WE | 4 | S | J | +2 | -680 | 68.75% | 45.77% | ||
R Rychlicki-A Gregorowicz,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 14 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | = | +120 | 12.50% | 43.39% | |||
8 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Rychlicki,*-A Gregorowicz | 15 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | -1 | -50 | 71.06% | 45.24% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Rychlicki,*-A Gregorowicz | 16 | WE | 2 | E | 3 | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 46.85% | |||
9 | A Gregorowicz-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-R Rychlicki | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | +2 | -460 | 43.75% | 46.67% | ||
A Gregorowicz-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-R Rychlicki | 18 | WE | 3 | E | 4 | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 46.51% | |||
10 | E Seichter-*,E Kubiak-J Nawrocki | 19 | NS | 2× | S | 4 | = | +470 | 100.00% | 49.32% | ||
E Seichter-*,E Kubiak-J Nawrocki | 20 | NS | 2 | S | 4 | +1 | +140 | 37.50% | 48.73% | |||
11 | E Seichter-E Kubiak,J Nawrocki-* | 21 | WE | 3 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 87.50% | 50.58% | ||
E Seichter-E Kubiak,J Nawrocki-* | 22 | WE | 2 | W | 5 | -2 | -200 | 12.50% | 48.85% | |||
12 | E Seichter-J Nawrocki,*-E Kubiak | 23 | WE | 3× | E | K | -1 | -200 | 12.50% | 47.27% | ||
E Seichter-J Nawrocki,*-E Kubiak | 24 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | -460 | 0.00% | 45.30% | |||
13 | R Kaniewski-*,T Borucki-R Jaworski | 25 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | +1 | -630 | 7.81% | 43.80% | ||
R Kaniewski-*,T Borucki-R Jaworski | 26 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | +660 | 50.00% | 44.04% | |||
14 | R Jaworski-R Kaniewski,T Borucki-* | 27 | WE | 4× | E | 3 | +1 | +690 | 100.00% | 46.11% | ||
R Jaworski-R Kaniewski,T Borucki-* | 28 | WE | 4 | S | 10 | -2 | +200 | 93.75% | 47.81% | |||
15 | *-R Jaworski,T Borucki-R Kaniewski | 29 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | -680 | 50.00% | 47.89% | ||
*-R Jaworski,T Borucki-R Kaniewski | 30 | NS | 3 | S | 8 | -1 | -50 | 37.50% | 47.54% | |||
SUMA: | 47.54% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 47.54% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 27 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48