Turniej Indywidualny 11: E Kubiak | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | P Urbański-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-R Jaworski | 3 | WE | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 56.25% | ||
P Urbański-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-R Jaworski | 4 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +650 | 68.75% | 62.50% | |||
2 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,P Urbański-R Jaworski | 5 | NS | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | -800 | 12.50% | 45.83% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,P Urbański-R Jaworski | 6 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +3 | +490 | 50.00% | 46.88% | |||
3 | *-P Urbański,M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Jaworski | 1 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 31.25% | 43.75% | ||
*-P Urbański,M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Jaworski | 2 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -430 | 25.00% | 40.63% | |||
4 | *-R Rychlicki,L Falkowski-R Kaniewski | 9 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +3 | -170 | 25.00% | 38.39% | ||
*-R Rychlicki,L Falkowski-R Kaniewski | 10 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +4 | +720 | 18.75% | 35.94% | |||
5 | R Rychlicki-L Falkowski,*-R Kaniewski | 11 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | +140 | 33.94% | 35.72% | ||
R Rychlicki-L Falkowski,*-R Kaniewski | 12 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 35.04% | |||
6 | L Falkowski-*,R Rychlicki-R Kaniewski | 7 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -600 | 56.25% | 36.97% | ||
L Falkowski-*,R Rychlicki-R Kaniewski | 8 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 33.89% | |||
7 | T Borucki-*,J Jurski-D Wilcz | 17 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +490 | 100.00% | 38.97% | ||
T Borucki-*,J Jurski-D Wilcz | 18 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -140 | 18.75% | 37.53% | |||
8 | D Wilcz-*,T Borucki-J Jurski | 13 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +660 | 12.50% | 35.86% | ||
D Wilcz-*,T Borucki-J Jurski | 14 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -170 | 75.00% | 38.30% | |||
9 | J Jurski-*,D Wilcz-T Borucki | 15 | NS | 1![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +100 | 78.13% | 40.65% | ||
J Jurski-*,D Wilcz-T Borucki | 16 | NS | 1![]() | E | ![]() | = | -80 | 85.12% | 43.12% | |||
10 | E Seichter-J Kowalski,*-J Nawrocki | 19 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | -470 | 0.00% | 40.85% | ||
E Seichter-J Kowalski,*-J Nawrocki | 20 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 62.50% | 41.93% | |||
11 | E Seichter-*,J Nawrocki-J Kowalski | 21 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 12.50% | 40.53% | ||
E Seichter-*,J Nawrocki-J Kowalski | 22 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | -2 | +200 | 87.50% | 42.66% | |||
12 | E Seichter-J Nawrocki,J Kowalski-* | 23 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -200 | 12.50% | 41.35% | ||
E Seichter-J Nawrocki,J Kowalski-* | 24 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 0.00% | 39.63% | |||
13 | E Poselt-M Graczkowski,*-A Gregorowicz | 29 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +680 | 50.00% | 40.05% | ||
E Poselt-M Graczkowski,*-A Gregorowicz | 30 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 81.25% | 41.63% | |||
14 | A Gregorowicz-M Graczkowski,E Poselt-* | 25 | WE | APM | 40.00% | 41.57% | ||||||
A Gregorowicz-M Graczkowski,E Poselt-* | 26 | WE | APM | 40.00% | 41.51% | |||||||
15 | *-M Graczkowski,A Gregorowicz-E Poselt | 27 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -130 | 50.00% | 41.81% | ||
*-M Graczkowski,A Gregorowicz-E Poselt | 28 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 43.75% | |||
SUMA: | 43.75% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 43.75% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 33 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48