Turniej Indywidualny 12: J Nawrocki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-D Wilcz,A Gregorowicz-R Kaniewski | 1 | NS | 6 | W | 8 | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 100.00% | ||
*-D Wilcz,A Gregorowicz-R Kaniewski | 2 | NS | 3 | E | 8 | -2 | +100 | 93.75% | 96.88% | |||
2 | R Kaniewski-*,A Gregorowicz-D Wilcz | 3 | NS | 1 | N | 4 | = | +90 | 62.50% | 85.42% | ||
R Kaniewski-*,A Gregorowicz-D Wilcz | 4 | NS | 3 | E | 3 | +1 | -170 | 100.00% | 89.06% | |||
3 | D Wilcz-R Kaniewski,A Gregorowicz-* | 5 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +1 | +450 | 18.75% | 75.00% | ||
D Wilcz-R Kaniewski,A Gregorowicz-* | 6 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 79.17% | |||
4 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-T Borucki,E Poselt-* | 7 | WE | 3 | W | 4 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 74.11% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-T Borucki,E Poselt-* | 8 | WE | 3 | E | J | -2 | -100 | 6.25% | 65.63% | |||
5 | *-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Poselt-T Borucki | 9 | NS | 4 | W | 6 | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 66.67% | ||
*-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Poselt-T Borucki | 10 | NS | 6 | N | 10 | +1 | +1460 | 37.50% | 63.75% | |||
6 | T Borucki-*,E Poselt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 11 | NS | 3 | W | K | +1 | -170 | 33.94% | 61.04% | ||
T Borucki-*,E Poselt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 12 | NS | 2 | S | 7 | = | +110 | 28.94% | 58.36% | |||
7 | L Falkowski-R Jaworski,M Graczkowski-* | 15 | WE | 1 | W | J | -1 | -50 | 71.06% | 59.34% | ||
L Falkowski-R Jaworski,M Graczkowski-* | 16 | WE | 2 | E | 3 | -2 | -200 | 0.81% | 55.16% | |||
8 | R Jaworski-M Graczkowski,L Falkowski-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +2 | -460 | 43.75% | 54.40% | ||
R Jaworski-M Graczkowski,L Falkowski-* | 18 | WE | 2 | E | 4 | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 53.73% | |||
9 | M Graczkowski-L Falkowski,R Jaworski-* | 13 | WE | 6 | S | J | = | -1430 | 12.50% | 51.31% | ||
M Graczkowski-L Falkowski,R Jaworski-* | 14 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | = | +400 | 37.50% | 50.54% | |||
10 | E Seichter-J Kowalski,E Kubiak-* | 19 | WE | 2× | S | 4 | = | -470 | 0.00% | 47.88% | ||
E Seichter-J Kowalski,E Kubiak-* | 20 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | +1 | -140 | 62.50% | 48.61% | |||
11 | E Seichter-E Kubiak,*-J Kowalski | 21 | WE | 3 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 87.50% | 50.46% | ||
E Seichter-E Kubiak,*-J Kowalski | 22 | WE | 2 | W | 5 | -2 | -200 | 12.50% | 48.74% | |||
12 | E Seichter-*,J Kowalski-E Kubiak | 23 | NS | 3× | E | K | -1 | +200 | 87.50% | 50.42% | ||
E Seichter-*,J Kowalski-E Kubiak | 24 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | +460 | 100.00% | 52.49% | |||
13 | J Jurski-*,P Urbański-R Rychlicki | 27 | NS | 3 | E | 9 | +1 | -430 | 37.50% | 51.89% | ||
J Jurski-*,P Urbański-R Rychlicki | 28 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 51.58% | |||
14 | *-P Urbański,J Jurski-R Rychlicki | 29 | NS | 6× | E | 6 | = | -1660 | 0.00% | 49.67% | ||
*-P Urbański,J Jurski-R Rychlicki | 30 | NS | 4 | E | A | -2 | +100 | 50.00% | 49.68% | |||
15 | P Urbański-J Jurski,*-R Rychlicki | 25 | WE | 4 | E | J | = | +620 | 64.06% | 50.17% | ||
P Urbański-J Jurski,*-R Rychlicki | 26 | WE | 4 | S | 3 | +1 | -660 | 50.00% | 50.17% | |||
SUMA: | 50.17% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 50.17% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 22 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48