Turniej Indywidualny 14: L Falkowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Kowalski-J Jurski,*-E Poselt | 5 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +460 | 43.75% | 43.75% | ||
J Kowalski-J Jurski,*-E Poselt | 6 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 62.50% | 53.13% | |||
2 | E Poselt-J Jurski,J Kowalski-* | 1 | WE | 5![]() | W | ![]() | = | +450 | 68.75% | 58.33% | ||
E Poselt-J Jurski,J Kowalski-* | 2 | WE | 6![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | -100 | 6.25% | 45.31% | |||
3 | *-J Jurski,E Poselt-J Kowalski | 3 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 45.00% | ||
*-J Jurski,E Poselt-J Kowalski | 4 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 42.71% | |||
4 | E Kubiak-R Rychlicki,*-R Kaniewski | 9 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +3 | +170 | 75.00% | 47.32% | ||
E Kubiak-R Rychlicki,*-R Kaniewski | 10 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +4 | -720 | 81.25% | 51.56% | |||
5 | R Rychlicki-*,E Kubiak-R Kaniewski | 11 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -140 | 66.06% | 53.17% | ||
R Rychlicki-*,E Kubiak-R Kaniewski | 12 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 54.96% | |||
6 | *-E Kubiak,R Rychlicki-R Kaniewski | 7 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -600 | 56.25% | 55.08% | ||
*-E Kubiak,R Rychlicki-R Kaniewski | 8 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 50.49% | |||
7 | *-R Jaworski,M Graczkowski-J Nawrocki | 15 | NS | 1![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 28.94% | 48.83% | ||
*-R Jaworski,M Graczkowski-J Nawrocki | 16 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | +200 | 99.19% | 52.43% | |||
8 | R Jaworski-M Graczkowski,*-J Nawrocki | 17 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | -460 | 43.75% | 51.85% | ||
R Jaworski-M Graczkowski,*-J Nawrocki | 18 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 51.34% | |||
9 | M Graczkowski-*,R Jaworski-J Nawrocki | 13 | NS | 6![]() | S | ![]() | = | +1430 | 87.50% | 53.47% | ||
M Graczkowski-*,R Jaworski-J Nawrocki | 14 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -400 | 62.50% | 53.97% | |||
10 | A Gregorowicz-*,P Urbański-T Borucki | 23 | NS | 1![]() | N | ![]() | = | +90 | 37.50% | 53.11% | ||
A Gregorowicz-*,P Urbański-T Borucki | 24 | NS | 1![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +180 | 37.50% | 52.32% | |||
11 | T Borucki-*,A Gregorowicz-P Urbański | 19 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 87.50% | 54.00% | ||
T Borucki-*,A Gregorowicz-P Urbański | 20 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | +600 | 93.75% | 55.81% | |||
12 | P Urbański-*,T Borucki-A Gregorowicz | 21 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +230 | 62.50% | 56.10% | ||
P Urbański-*,T Borucki-A Gregorowicz | 22 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 37.50% | 55.32% | |||
13 | E Seichter-D Wilcz,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 25 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | +3 | +150 | 7.81% | 53.42% | ||
E Seichter-D Wilcz,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 26 | WE | 6![]() | N | ![]() | -2 | +200 | 99.19% | 55.18% | |||
14 | E Seichter-*,M Bajerska-Wasilius-D Wilcz | 27 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 18.75% | 53.83% | ||
E Seichter-*,M Bajerska-Wasilius-D Wilcz | 28 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 52.80% | |||
15 | E Seichter-M Bajerska-Wasilius,D Wilcz-* | 29 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +680 | 50.00% | 52.71% | ||
E Seichter-M Bajerska-Wasilius,D Wilcz-* | 30 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | = | -140 | 25.00% | 51.78% | |||
SUMA: | 51.78% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 51.78% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 15 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48