Turniej Indywidualny 15: M Bajerska-Wasilius | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | P Urbański-*,E Kubiak-R Jaworski | 3 | NS | 2 | N | 6 | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 43.75% | ||
P Urbański-*,E Kubiak-R Jaworski | 4 | NS | 4 | E | 5 | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 37.50% | |||
2 | *-E Kubiak,P Urbański-R Jaworski | 5 | NS | 2× | N | 10 | -3 | -800 | 12.50% | 29.17% | ||
*-E Kubiak,P Urbański-R Jaworski | 6 | NS | 3 | N | 4 | +3 | +490 | 50.00% | 34.38% | |||
3 | E Kubiak-P Urbański,*-R Jaworski | 1 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +1 | +450 | 68.75% | 41.25% | ||
E Kubiak-P Urbański,*-R Jaworski | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | +1 | +430 | 75.00% | 46.88% | |||
4 | *-T Borucki,E Poselt-J Nawrocki | 7 | NS | 3 | W | 4 | = | -600 | 56.25% | 48.21% | ||
*-T Borucki,E Poselt-J Nawrocki | 8 | NS | 3 | E | J | -2 | +100 | 93.75% | 53.91% | |||
5 | J Nawrocki-*,E Poselt-T Borucki | 9 | NS | 4 | W | 6 | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 56.25% | ||
J Nawrocki-*,E Poselt-T Borucki | 10 | NS | 6 | N | 10 | +1 | +1460 | 37.50% | 54.38% | |||
6 | T Borucki-J Nawrocki,E Poselt-* | 11 | WE | 3 | W | K | +1 | +170 | 66.06% | 55.44% | ||
T Borucki-J Nawrocki,E Poselt-* | 12 | WE | 2 | S | 7 | = | -110 | 71.06% | 56.74% | |||
7 | R Rychlicki-A Gregorowicz,J Kowalski-* | 13 | WE | 4 | S | J | +2 | -680 | 68.75% | 57.66% | ||
R Rychlicki-A Gregorowicz,J Kowalski-* | 14 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | = | +120 | 12.50% | 54.44% | |||
8 | *-R Rychlicki,J Kowalski-A Gregorowicz | 15 | NS | 2 | E | 9 | -1 | +50 | 28.94% | 52.74% | ||
*-R Rychlicki,J Kowalski-A Gregorowicz | 16 | NS | 2 | E | 3 | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 51.25% | |||
9 | A Gregorowicz-*,J Kowalski-R Rychlicki | 17 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +2 | +460 | 56.25% | 51.54% | ||
A Gregorowicz-*,J Kowalski-R Rychlicki | 18 | NS | 3 | E | 4 | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 51.81% | |||
10 | M Graczkowski-R Kaniewski,J Jurski-* | 21 | WE | 4 | S | A | +1 | -650 | 0.00% | 49.08% | ||
M Graczkowski-R Kaniewski,J Jurski-* | 22 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | -3 | -300 | 0.00% | 46.62% | |||
11 | R Kaniewski-J Jurski,M Graczkowski-* | 23 | WE | 2 | S | 5 | +2 | -170 | 37.50% | 46.19% | ||
R Kaniewski-J Jurski,M Graczkowski-* | 24 | WE | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | +50 | 87.50% | 48.07% | |||
12 | J Jurski-M Graczkowski,R Kaniewski-* | 19 | WE | 5× | S | Q | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 50.33% | ||
J Jurski-M Graczkowski,R Kaniewski-* | 20 | WE | 3 | N | 7 | +1 | -130 | 87.50% | 51.87% | |||
13 | E Seichter-D Wilcz,L Falkowski-* | 25 | WE | 2 | W | J | +3 | +150 | 7.81% | 50.11% | ||
E Seichter-D Wilcz,L Falkowski-* | 26 | WE | 6 | N | 6 | -2 | +200 | 99.19% | 52.00% | |||
14 | E Seichter-L Falkowski,*-D Wilcz | 27 | WE | 4 | E | 9 | +1 | +450 | 81.25% | 53.08% | ||
E Seichter-L Falkowski,*-D Wilcz | 28 | WE | 4 | N | J | -1 | +100 | 75.00% | 53.87% | |||
15 | E Seichter-*,D Wilcz-L Falkowski | 29 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | -680 | 50.00% | 53.73% | ||
E Seichter-*,D Wilcz-L Falkowski | 30 | NS | 3 | S | J | = | +140 | 75.00% | 54.44% | |||
SUMA: | 54.44% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 54.44% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 7 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48