Turniej Indywidualny 16: E Seichter | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-T Borucki,M Graczkowski-R Rychlicki | 1 | NS | 4 | E | 10 | +1 | -450 | 31.25% | 31.25% | ||
*-T Borucki,M Graczkowski-R Rychlicki | 2 | NS | 5 | E | A | = | -400 | 50.00% | 40.63% | |||
2 | *-M Graczkowski,R Rychlicki-T Borucki | 3 | NS | 3× | E | 6 | -3 | +800 | 100.00% | 60.42% | ||
*-M Graczkowski,R Rychlicki-T Borucki | 4 | NS | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 53.13% | |||
3 | *-R Rychlicki,T Borucki-M Graczkowski | 5 | NS | 2× | N | 6 | -3 | -800 | 12.50% | 45.00% | ||
*-R Rychlicki,T Borucki-M Graczkowski | 6 | NS | 2× | W | 2 | -3 | +800 | 81.25% | 51.04% | |||
4 | *-A Gregorowicz,J Jurski-R Jaworski | 7 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | = | -600 | 56.25% | 51.79% | ||
*-A Gregorowicz,J Jurski-R Jaworski | 8 | NS | 2 | W | A | +1 | -140 | 25.00% | 48.44% | |||
5 | *-J Jurski,R Jaworski-A Gregorowicz | 9 | NS | 5 | E | 2 | = | -600 | 12.50% | 44.44% | ||
*-J Jurski,R Jaworski-A Gregorowicz | 10 | NS | 6 | S | 7 | +1 | +1470 | 50.00% | 45.00% | |||
6 | *-R Jaworski,A Gregorowicz-J Jurski | 11 | NS | 3 | W | K | +2 | -200 | 1.81% | 41.07% | ||
*-R Jaworski,A Gregorowicz-J Jurski | 12 | NS | 2 | S | 4 | +2 | +170 | 99.19% | 45.92% | |||
7 | *-E Poselt,P Urbański-R Kaniewski | 13 | NS | 6 | S | J | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 42.38% | ||
*-E Poselt,P Urbański-R Kaniewski | 14 | NS | 4 | E | 9 | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 46.50% | |||
8 | *-P Urbański,R Kaniewski-E Poselt | 15 | NS | 2 | W | J | -4 | +200 | 99.19% | 50.01% | ||
*-P Urbański,R Kaniewski-E Poselt | 16 | NS | 2 | E | 4 | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 48.70% | |||
9 | *-R Kaniewski,E Poselt-P Urbański | 17 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +1 | +430 | 6.25% | 46.20% | ||
*-R Kaniewski,E Poselt-P Urbański | 18 | NS | 3 | E | Q | -3 | +150 | 100.00% | 49.19% | |||
10 | *-J Kowalski,E Kubiak-J Nawrocki | 19 | NS | 2× | S | 4 | = | +470 | 100.00% | 51.86% | ||
*-J Kowalski,E Kubiak-J Nawrocki | 20 | NS | 2 | S | 4 | +1 | +140 | 37.50% | 51.14% | |||
11 | *-E Kubiak,J Nawrocki-J Kowalski | 21 | NS | 3 | E | A | -1 | +50 | 12.50% | 49.30% | ||
*-E Kubiak,J Nawrocki-J Kowalski | 22 | NS | 2 | W | 5 | -2 | +200 | 87.50% | 51.04% | |||
12 | *-J Nawrocki,J Kowalski-E Kubiak | 23 | NS | 3× | E | K | -1 | +200 | 87.50% | 52.63% | ||
*-J Nawrocki,J Kowalski-E Kubiak | 24 | NS | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | +460 | 100.00% | 54.60% | |||
13 | *-D Wilcz,L Falkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 25 | NS | 2 | W | J | +3 | -150 | 92.19% | 56.10% | ||
*-D Wilcz,L Falkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 26 | NS | 6 | N | 6 | -2 | -200 | 0.81% | 53.98% | |||
14 | *-L Falkowski,M Bajerska-Wasilius-D Wilcz | 27 | NS | 4 | E | 9 | +1 | -450 | 18.75% | 52.67% | ||
*-L Falkowski,M Bajerska-Wasilius-D Wilcz | 28 | NS | 4 | N | J | -1 | -100 | 25.00% | 51.68% | |||
15 | *-M Bajerska-Wasilius,D Wilcz-L Falkowski | 29 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | -680 | 50.00% | 51.63% | ||
*-M Bajerska-Wasilius,D Wilcz-L Falkowski | 30 | NS | 3 | S | J | = | +140 | 75.00% | 52.40% | |||
SUMA: | 52.40% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 52.40% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 13 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48