Turniej Indywidualny 2: M Graczkowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | E Seichter-T Borucki,*-R Rychlicki | 1 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +450 | 68.75% | 68.75% | ||
E Seichter-T Borucki,*-R Rychlicki | 2 | WE | 5![]() | E | ![]() | = | +400 | 50.00% | 59.38% | |||
2 | E Seichter-*,R Rychlicki-T Borucki | 3 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -3 | +800 | 100.00% | 72.92% | ||
E Seichter-*,R Rychlicki-T Borucki | 4 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 62.50% | |||
3 | E Seichter-R Rychlicki,T Borucki-* | 5 | WE | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | +800 | 87.50% | 67.50% | ||
E Seichter-R Rychlicki,T Borucki-* | 6 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | -3 | -800 | 18.75% | 59.38% | |||
4 | D Wilcz-P Urbański,*-J Kowalski | 11 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | +170 | 66.06% | 60.33% | ||
D Wilcz-P Urbański,*-J Kowalski | 12 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 56.41% | |||
5 | J Kowalski-P Urbański,D Wilcz-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | +600 | 43.75% | 55.00% | ||
J Kowalski-P Urbański,D Wilcz-* | 8 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | +130 | 50.00% | 54.50% | |||
6 | *-P Urbański,J Kowalski-D Wilcz | 9 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 100.00% | 58.64% | ||
*-P Urbański,J Kowalski-D Wilcz | 10 | NS | 7![]() | N | ![]() | = | +2210 | 68.75% | 59.48% | |||
7 | L Falkowski-R Jaworski,*-J Nawrocki | 15 | WE | 1![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 71.06% | 60.37% | ||
L Falkowski-R Jaworski,*-J Nawrocki | 16 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | -200 | 0.81% | 56.12% | |||
8 | R Jaworski-*,L Falkowski-J Nawrocki | 17 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | +460 | 56.25% | 56.12% | ||
R Jaworski-*,L Falkowski-J Nawrocki | 18 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 56.13% | |||
9 | *-L Falkowski,R Jaworski-J Nawrocki | 13 | NS | 6![]() | S | ![]() | = | +1430 | 87.50% | 57.98% | ||
*-L Falkowski,R Jaworski-J Nawrocki | 14 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | -400 | 62.50% | 58.23% | |||
10 | *-R Kaniewski,J Jurski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 21 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 60.43% | ||
*-R Kaniewski,J Jurski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 22 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -3 | +300 | 100.00% | 62.41% | |||
11 | R Kaniewski-J Jurski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 23 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | -170 | 37.50% | 61.22% | ||
R Kaniewski-J Jurski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 24 | WE | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 87.50% | 62.41% | |||
12 | J Jurski-*,R Kaniewski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 19 | NS | 5![]() | S | ![]() | -4 | -800 | 0.00% | 59.70% | ||
J Jurski-*,R Kaniewski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 20 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | +130 | 12.50% | 57.73% | |||
13 | E Poselt-*,E Kubiak-A Gregorowicz | 29 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | -680 | 50.00% | 57.42% | ||
E Poselt-*,E Kubiak-A Gregorowicz | 30 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -100 | 18.75% | 55.94% | |||
14 | A Gregorowicz-*,E Poselt-E Kubiak | 25 | NS | APM | 60.00% | 56.09% | ||||||
A Gregorowicz-*,E Poselt-E Kubiak | 26 | NS | APM | 60.00% | 56.23% | |||||||
15 | E Kubiak-*,A Gregorowicz-E Poselt | 27 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -130 | 50.00% | 56.01% | ||
E Kubiak-*,A Gregorowicz-E Poselt | 28 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 57.48% | |||
SUMA: | 57.48% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 57.48% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 5 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48