Turniej Indywidualny 3: R Rychlicki | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | E Seichter-T Borucki,M Graczkowski-* | 1 | WE | 4 | E | 10 | +1 | +450 | 68.75% | 68.75% | ||
E Seichter-T Borucki,M Graczkowski-* | 2 | WE | 5 | E | A | = | +400 | 50.00% | 59.38% | |||
2 | E Seichter-M Graczkowski,*-T Borucki | 3 | WE | 3× | E | 6 | -3 | -800 | 0.00% | 39.58% | ||
E Seichter-M Graczkowski,*-T Borucki | 4 | WE | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | +650 | 68.75% | 46.88% | |||
3 | E Seichter-*,T Borucki-M Graczkowski | 5 | NS | 2× | N | 6 | -3 | -800 | 12.50% | 40.00% | ||
E Seichter-*,T Borucki-M Graczkowski | 6 | NS | 2× | W | 2 | -3 | +800 | 81.25% | 46.88% | |||
4 | E Kubiak-*,L Falkowski-R Kaniewski | 9 | NS | 3 | E | 3 | +3 | -170 | 25.00% | 43.75% | ||
E Kubiak-*,L Falkowski-R Kaniewski | 10 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +4 | +720 | 18.75% | 40.63% | |||
5 | *-L Falkowski,E Kubiak-R Kaniewski | 11 | NS | 3 | W | K | = | -140 | 66.06% | 43.45% | ||
*-L Falkowski,E Kubiak-R Kaniewski | 12 | NS | 2 | S | A | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 46.21% | |||
6 | L Falkowski-E Kubiak,*-R Kaniewski | 7 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 45.99% | ||
L Falkowski-E Kubiak,*-R Kaniewski | 8 | WE | 4× | S | K | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 50.49% | |||
7 | *-A Gregorowicz,J Kowalski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 13 | NS | 4 | S | J | +2 | +680 | 31.25% | 49.01% | ||
*-A Gregorowicz,J Kowalski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 14 | NS | 2 | E | 9 | = | -120 | 87.50% | 51.76% | |||
8 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,J Kowalski-A Gregorowicz | 15 | NS | 2 | E | 9 | -1 | +50 | 28.94% | 50.24% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-*,J Kowalski-A Gregorowicz | 16 | NS | 2 | E | 3 | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 48.91% | |||
9 | A Gregorowicz-M Bajerska-Wasilius,J Kowalski-* | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | +2 | -460 | 43.75% | 48.60% | ||
A Gregorowicz-M Bajerska-Wasilius,J Kowalski-* | 18 | WE | 3 | E | 4 | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 48.33% | |||
10 | R Jaworski-E Poselt,D Wilcz-* | 19 | WE | 2 | E | 2 | +2 | +170 | 50.00% | 48.42% | ||
R Jaworski-E Poselt,D Wilcz-* | 20 | WE | 1 | N | 3 | +2 | -150 | 31.25% | 47.56% | |||
11 | *-R Jaworski,D Wilcz-E Poselt | 21 | NS | 4 | S | Q | = | +620 | 87.50% | 49.46% | ||
*-R Jaworski,D Wilcz-E Poselt | 22 | NS | 1 | N | 5 | +1 | +120 | 75.00% | 50.62% | |||
12 | E Poselt-*,D Wilcz-R Jaworski | 23 | NS | 3 | S | 4 | -4 | -400 | 0.00% | 48.42% | ||
E Poselt-*,D Wilcz-R Jaworski | 24 | NS | 2 | N | 5 | = | +110 | 25.00% | 47.45% | |||
13 | J Jurski-J Nawrocki,P Urbański-* | 27 | WE | 3 | E | 9 | +1 | +430 | 62.50% | 48.05% | ||
J Jurski-J Nawrocki,P Urbański-* | 28 | WE | 3 | N | 3 | = | -600 | 56.25% | 48.37% | |||
14 | J Nawrocki-P Urbański,J Jurski-* | 29 | WE | 6× | E | 6 | = | +1660 | 100.00% | 50.28% | ||
J Nawrocki-P Urbański,J Jurski-* | 30 | WE | 4 | E | A | -2 | -100 | 50.00% | 50.27% | |||
15 | P Urbański-J Jurski,J Nawrocki-* | 25 | WE | 4 | E | J | = | +620 | 64.06% | 50.74% | ||
P Urbański-J Jurski,J Nawrocki-* | 26 | WE | 4 | S | 3 | +1 | -660 | 50.00% | 50.72% | |||
SUMA: | 50.72% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 50.72% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 20 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48