Turniej Indywidualny 4: A Gregorowicz | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Nawrocki-D Wilcz,*-R Kaniewski | 1 | WE | 6 | W | 8 | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
J Nawrocki-D Wilcz,*-R Kaniewski | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 8 | -2 | -100 | 6.25% | 3.13% | |||
2 | R Kaniewski-J Nawrocki,*-D Wilcz | 3 | WE | 1 | N | 4 | = | -90 | 37.50% | 14.58% | ||
R Kaniewski-J Nawrocki,*-D Wilcz | 4 | WE | 3 | E | 3 | +1 | +170 | 0.00% | 10.94% | |||
3 | D Wilcz-R Kaniewski,*-J Nawrocki | 5 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +1 | +450 | 18.75% | 12.50% | ||
D Wilcz-R Kaniewski,*-J Nawrocki | 6 | WE | 4 | W | A | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 27.08% | |||
4 | E Seichter-*,J Jurski-R Jaworski | 7 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | = | -600 | 56.25% | 31.25% | ||
E Seichter-*,J Jurski-R Jaworski | 8 | NS | 2 | W | A | +1 | -140 | 25.00% | 30.47% | |||
5 | E Seichter-J Jurski,R Jaworski-* | 9 | WE | 5 | E | 2 | = | +600 | 87.50% | 36.81% | ||
E Seichter-J Jurski,R Jaworski-* | 10 | WE | 6 | S | 7 | +1 | -1470 | 50.00% | 38.13% | |||
6 | E Seichter-R Jaworski,*-J Jurski | 11 | WE | 3 | W | K | +2 | +200 | 98.19% | 43.59% | ||
E Seichter-R Jaworski,*-J Jurski | 12 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | +2 | -170 | 0.81% | 40.02% | |||
7 | R Rychlicki-*,J Kowalski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 13 | NS | 4 | S | J | +2 | +680 | 31.25% | 39.35% | ||
R Rychlicki-*,J Kowalski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 14 | NS | 2 | E | 9 | = | -120 | 87.50% | 42.79% | |||
8 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Rychlicki,J Kowalski-* | 15 | WE | 2 | E | 9 | -1 | -50 | 71.06% | 44.67% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Rychlicki,J Kowalski-* | 16 | WE | 2 | E | 3 | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 46.32% | |||
9 | *-M Bajerska-Wasilius,J Kowalski-R Rychlicki | 17 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +2 | +460 | 56.25% | 46.90% | ||
*-M Bajerska-Wasilius,J Kowalski-R Rychlicki | 18 | NS | 3 | E | 4 | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 47.42% | |||
10 | *-L Falkowski,P Urbański-T Borucki | 23 | NS | 1 | N | 5 | = | +90 | 37.50% | 46.90% | ||
*-L Falkowski,P Urbański-T Borucki | 24 | NS | 1 | S | 9 | +3 | +180 | 37.50% | 46.43% | |||
11 | T Borucki-L Falkowski,*-P Urbański | 19 | WE | 2 | S | Q | = | -110 | 12.50% | 44.82% | ||
T Borucki-L Falkowski,*-P Urbański | 20 | WE | 3 | N | 7 | = | -600 | 6.25% | 43.06% | |||
12 | P Urbański-L Falkowski,T Borucki-* | 21 | WE | 3 | S | Q | +3 | -230 | 37.50% | 42.82% | ||
P Urbański-L Falkowski,T Borucki-* | 22 | WE | 3 | S | K | -1 | +50 | 62.50% | 43.64% | |||
13 | E Poselt-M Graczkowski,E Kubiak-* | 29 | WE | 4 | E | 5 | +2 | +680 | 50.00% | 43.90% | ||
E Poselt-M Graczkowski,E Kubiak-* | 30 | WE | 4× | S | 5 | -1 | +100 | 81.25% | 45.33% | |||
14 | *-M Graczkowski,E Poselt-E Kubiak | 25 | NS | APM | 60.00% | 45.88% | ||||||
*-M Graczkowski,E Poselt-E Kubiak | 26 | NS | APM | 60.00% | 46.38% | |||||||
15 | E Kubiak-M Graczkowski,*-E Poselt | 27 | WE | 3 | W | 6 | +1 | +130 | 50.00% | 46.50% | ||
E Kubiak-M Graczkowski,*-E Poselt | 28 | WE | 2× | E | 10 | -4 | -800 | 0.00% | 44.95% | |||
SUMA: | 44.95% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 44.95% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 29 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48