Turniej Indywidualny 5: J Jurski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Kowalski-*,L Falkowski-E Poselt | 5 | NS | 3 | E | 4 | +2 | -460 | 56.25% | 56.25% | ||
J Kowalski-*,L Falkowski-E Poselt | 6 | NS | 4 | S | 6 | +1 | +450 | 37.50% | 46.88% | |||
2 | E Poselt-*,J Kowalski-L Falkowski | 1 | NS | 5 | W | 6 | = | -450 | 31.25% | 41.67% | ||
E Poselt-*,J Kowalski-L Falkowski | 2 | NS | 6 | E | 6 | -2 | +100 | 93.75% | 54.69% | |||
3 | L Falkowski-*,E Poselt-J Kowalski | 3 | NS | 2 | S | Q | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 52.50% | ||
L Falkowski-*,E Poselt-J Kowalski | 4 | NS | 4 | E | 3 | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 48.96% | |||
4 | E Seichter-A Gregorowicz,*-R Jaworski | 7 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 48.21% | ||
E Seichter-A Gregorowicz,*-R Jaworski | 8 | WE | 2 | W | A | +1 | +140 | 75.00% | 51.56% | |||
5 | E Seichter-*,R Jaworski-A Gregorowicz | 9 | NS | 5 | E | 2 | = | -600 | 12.50% | 47.22% | ||
E Seichter-*,R Jaworski-A Gregorowicz | 10 | NS | 6 | S | 7 | +1 | +1470 | 50.00% | 47.50% | |||
6 | E Seichter-R Jaworski,A Gregorowicz-* | 11 | WE | 3 | W | K | +2 | +200 | 98.19% | 52.11% | ||
E Seichter-R Jaworski,A Gregorowicz-* | 12 | WE | 2 | S | 4 | +2 | -170 | 0.81% | 47.83% | |||
7 | T Borucki-E Kubiak,*-D Wilcz | 17 | WE | 3 | S | 2 | +3 | -490 | 0.00% | 44.15% | ||
T Borucki-E Kubiak,*-D Wilcz | 18 | WE | 3 | E | 7 | = | +140 | 81.25% | 46.80% | |||
8 | D Wilcz-E Kubiak,T Borucki-* | 13 | WE | 4 | S | J | +1 | -660 | 87.50% | 49.52% | ||
D Wilcz-E Kubiak,T Borucki-* | 14 | WE | 3 | E | A | +1 | +170 | 25.00% | 47.98% | |||
9 | *-E Kubiak,D Wilcz-T Borucki | 15 | NS | 1 | W | J | -2 | +100 | 78.13% | 49.76% | ||
*-E Kubiak,D Wilcz-T Borucki | 16 | NS | 1 | E | A | = | -80 | 85.12% | 51.72% | |||
10 | M Graczkowski-R Kaniewski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 21 | WE | 4 | S | A | +1 | -650 | 0.00% | 49.00% | ||
M Graczkowski-R Kaniewski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 22 | WE | 3 | W | 2 | -3 | -300 | 0.00% | 46.55% | |||
11 | R Kaniewski-*,M Graczkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 23 | NS | 2 | S | 5 | +2 | +170 | 62.50% | 47.31% | ||
R Kaniewski-*,M Graczkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 24 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | -1 | -50 | 12.50% | 45.73% | |||
12 | *-M Graczkowski,R Kaniewski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 19 | NS | 5× | S | Q | -4 | -800 | 0.00% | 43.74% | ||
*-M Graczkowski,R Kaniewski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 20 | NS | 3 | N | 7 | +1 | +130 | 12.50% | 42.44% | |||
13 | *-J Nawrocki,P Urbański-R Rychlicki | 27 | NS | 3 | E | 9 | +1 | -430 | 37.50% | 42.24% | ||
*-J Nawrocki,P Urbański-R Rychlicki | 28 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 42.30% | |||
14 | J Nawrocki-P Urbański,*-R Rychlicki | 29 | WE | 6× | E | 6 | = | +1660 | 100.00% | 44.44% | ||
J Nawrocki-P Urbański,*-R Rychlicki | 30 | WE | 4 | E | A | -2 | -100 | 50.00% | 44.63% | |||
15 | P Urbański-*,J Nawrocki-R Rychlicki | 25 | NS | 4 | E | J | = | -620 | 35.94% | 44.33% | ||
P Urbański-*,J Nawrocki-R Rychlicki | 26 | NS | 4 | S | 3 | +1 | +660 | 50.00% | 44.52% | |||
SUMA: | 44.52% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 44.52% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 30 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48