Turniej Indywidualny 6: R Jaworski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | P Urbański-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Kubiak-* | 3 | WE | 2 | N | 6 | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 56.25% | ||
P Urbański-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Kubiak-* | 4 | WE | 4 | E | 5 | +1 | +650 | 68.75% | 62.50% | |||
2 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-E Kubiak,P Urbański-* | 5 | WE | 2× | N | 10 | -3 | +800 | 87.50% | 70.83% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-E Kubiak,P Urbański-* | 6 | WE | 3 | N | 4 | +3 | -490 | 50.00% | 65.63% | |||
3 | E Kubiak-P Urbański,M Bajerska-Wasilius-* | 1 | WE | 4 | W | 8 | +1 | +450 | 68.75% | 66.25% | ||
E Kubiak-P Urbański,M Bajerska-Wasilius-* | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | +1 | +430 | 75.00% | 67.71% | |||
4 | E Seichter-A Gregorowicz,J Jurski-* | 7 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | = | +600 | 43.75% | 64.29% | ||
E Seichter-A Gregorowicz,J Jurski-* | 8 | WE | 2 | W | A | +1 | +140 | 75.00% | 65.63% | |||
5 | E Seichter-J Jurski,*-A Gregorowicz | 9 | WE | 5 | E | 2 | = | +600 | 87.50% | 68.06% | ||
E Seichter-J Jurski,*-A Gregorowicz | 10 | WE | 6 | S | 7 | +1 | -1470 | 50.00% | 66.25% | |||
6 | E Seichter-*,A Gregorowicz-J Jurski | 11 | NS | 3 | W | K | +2 | -200 | 1.81% | 60.39% | ||
E Seichter-*,A Gregorowicz-J Jurski | 12 | NS | 2 | S | 4 | +2 | +170 | 99.19% | 63.63% | |||
7 | L Falkowski-*,M Graczkowski-J Nawrocki | 15 | NS | 1 | W | J | -1 | +50 | 28.94% | 60.96% | ||
L Falkowski-*,M Graczkowski-J Nawrocki | 16 | NS | 2 | E | 3 | -2 | +200 | 99.19% | 63.69% | |||
8 | *-M Graczkowski,L Falkowski-J Nawrocki | 17 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +2 | +460 | 56.25% | 63.19% | ||
*-M Graczkowski,L Falkowski-J Nawrocki | 18 | NS | 2 | E | 4 | -1 | +50 | 56.25% | 62.76% | |||
9 | M Graczkowski-L Falkowski,*-J Nawrocki | 13 | WE | 6 | S | J | = | -1430 | 12.50% | 59.80% | ||
M Graczkowski-L Falkowski,*-J Nawrocki | 14 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | = | +400 | 37.50% | 58.56% | |||
10 | *-E Poselt,D Wilcz-R Rychlicki | 19 | NS | 2 | E | 2 | +2 | -170 | 50.00% | 58.11% | ||
*-E Poselt,D Wilcz-R Rychlicki | 20 | NS | 1 | N | 3 | +2 | +150 | 68.75% | 58.64% | |||
11 | R Rychlicki-*,D Wilcz-E Poselt | 21 | NS | 4 | S | Q | = | +620 | 87.50% | 60.02% | ||
R Rychlicki-*,D Wilcz-E Poselt | 22 | NS | 1 | N | 5 | +1 | +120 | 75.00% | 60.70% | |||
12 | E Poselt-R Rychlicki,D Wilcz-* | 23 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | -4 | +400 | 100.00% | 62.41% | ||
E Poselt-R Rychlicki,D Wilcz-* | 24 | WE | 2 | N | 5 | = | -110 | 75.00% | 62.93% | |||
13 | R Kaniewski-J Kowalski,T Borucki-* | 25 | WE | 3 | E | 5 | +1 | +630 | 92.19% | 64.10% | ||
R Kaniewski-J Kowalski,T Borucki-* | 26 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | -660 | 50.00% | 63.56% | |||
14 | *-R Kaniewski,T Borucki-J Kowalski | 27 | NS | 4× | E | 3 | +1 | -690 | 0.00% | 61.21% | ||
*-R Kaniewski,T Borucki-J Kowalski | 28 | NS | 4 | S | 10 | -2 | -200 | 6.25% | 59.24% | |||
15 | J Kowalski-*,T Borucki-R Kaniewski | 29 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | -680 | 50.00% | 58.92% | ||
J Kowalski-*,T Borucki-R Kaniewski | 30 | NS | 3 | S | 8 | -1 | -50 | 37.50% | 58.21% | |||
SUMA: | 58.21% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 58.21% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 4 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48