Turniej Indywidualny 8: P Urbański | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Kubiak-R Jaworski | 3 | NS | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 43.75% | 43.75% | ||
*-M Bajerska-Wasilius,E Kubiak-R Jaworski | 4 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 31.25% | 37.50% | |||
2 | M Bajerska-Wasilius-E Kubiak,*-R Jaworski | 5 | WE | 2![]() | N | ![]() | -3 | +800 | 87.50% | 54.17% | ||
M Bajerska-Wasilius-E Kubiak,*-R Jaworski | 6 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +3 | -490 | 50.00% | 53.13% | |||
3 | E Kubiak-*,M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Jaworski | 1 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 31.25% | 48.75% | ||
E Kubiak-*,M Bajerska-Wasilius-R Jaworski | 2 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -430 | 25.00% | 44.79% | |||
4 | D Wilcz-*,M Graczkowski-J Kowalski | 11 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | +2 | -170 | 33.94% | 43.24% | ||
D Wilcz-*,M Graczkowski-J Kowalski | 12 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 46.72% | |||
5 | J Kowalski-*,D Wilcz-M Graczkowski | 7 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | -600 | 56.25% | 47.78% | ||
J Kowalski-*,D Wilcz-M Graczkowski | 8 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -130 | 50.00% | 48.00% | |||
6 | M Graczkowski-*,J Kowalski-D Wilcz | 9 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | +110 | 100.00% | 52.73% | ||
M Graczkowski-*,J Kowalski-D Wilcz | 10 | NS | 7![]() | N | ![]() | = | +2210 | 68.75% | 54.06% | |||
7 | E Seichter-E Poselt,*-R Kaniewski | 13 | WE | 6![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 57.60% | ||
E Seichter-E Poselt,*-R Kaniewski | 14 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 53.48% | |||
8 | E Seichter-*,R Kaniewski-E Poselt | 15 | NS | 2![]() | W | ![]() | -4 | +200 | 99.19% | 56.53% | ||
E Seichter-*,R Kaniewski-E Poselt | 16 | NS | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 54.80% | |||
9 | E Seichter-R Kaniewski,E Poselt-* | 17 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -430 | 93.75% | 57.10% | ||
E Seichter-R Kaniewski,E Poselt-* | 18 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -3 | -150 | 0.00% | 53.92% | |||
10 | A Gregorowicz-L Falkowski,*-T Borucki | 23 | WE | 1![]() | N | ![]() | = | -90 | 62.50% | 54.37% | ||
A Gregorowicz-L Falkowski,*-T Borucki | 24 | WE | 1![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | -180 | 62.50% | 54.78% | |||
11 | T Borucki-L Falkowski,A Gregorowicz-* | 19 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | = | -110 | 12.50% | 52.77% | ||
T Borucki-L Falkowski,A Gregorowicz-* | 20 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | -600 | 6.25% | 50.65% | |||
12 | *-L Falkowski,T Borucki-A Gregorowicz | 21 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +3 | +230 | 62.50% | 51.17% | ||
*-L Falkowski,T Borucki-A Gregorowicz | 22 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 37.50% | 50.60% | |||
13 | J Jurski-J Nawrocki,*-R Rychlicki | 27 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +430 | 62.50% | 51.07% | ||
J Jurski-J Nawrocki,*-R Rychlicki | 28 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | = | -600 | 56.25% | 51.27% | |||
14 | J Nawrocki-*,J Jurski-R Rychlicki | 29 | NS | 6![]() | E | ![]() | = | -1660 | 0.00% | 49.37% | ||
J Nawrocki-*,J Jurski-R Rychlicki | 30 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | +100 | 50.00% | 49.40% | |||
15 | *-J Jurski,J Nawrocki-R Rychlicki | 25 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | = | -620 | 35.94% | 48.93% | ||
*-J Jurski,J Nawrocki-R Rychlicki | 26 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +660 | 50.00% | 48.97% | |||
SUMA: | 48.97% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 48.97% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 24 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48