Turniej Indywidualny 9: R Kaniewski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | J Nawrocki-D Wilcz,A Gregorowicz-* | 1 | WE | 6![]() | W | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
J Nawrocki-D Wilcz,A Gregorowicz-* | 2 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -2 | -100 | 6.25% | 3.13% | |||
2 | *-J Nawrocki,A Gregorowicz-D Wilcz | 3 | NS | 1![]() | N | ![]() | = | +90 | 62.50% | 22.92% | ||
*-J Nawrocki,A Gregorowicz-D Wilcz | 4 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -170 | 100.00% | 42.19% | |||
3 | D Wilcz-*,A Gregorowicz-J Nawrocki | 5 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -450 | 81.25% | 50.00% | ||
D Wilcz-*,A Gregorowicz-J Nawrocki | 6 | NS | 4![]() | W | ![]() | +1 | -650 | 0.00% | 41.67% | |||
4 | E Kubiak-R Rychlicki,L Falkowski-* | 9 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +3 | +170 | 75.00% | 46.43% | ||
E Kubiak-R Rychlicki,L Falkowski-* | 10 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +4 | -720 | 81.25% | 50.78% | |||
5 | R Rychlicki-L Falkowski,E Kubiak-* | 11 | WE | 3![]() | W | ![]() | = | +140 | 33.94% | 48.91% | ||
R Rychlicki-L Falkowski,E Kubiak-* | 12 | WE | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | -140 | 28.94% | 46.91% | |||
6 | L Falkowski-E Kubiak,R Rychlicki-* | 7 | WE | 3![]() | E | ![]() | = | +600 | 43.75% | 46.63% | ||
L Falkowski-E Kubiak,R Rychlicki-* | 8 | WE | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 51.07% | |||
7 | E Seichter-E Poselt,P Urbański-* | 13 | WE | 6![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 54.84% | ||
E Seichter-E Poselt,P Urbański-* | 14 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 50.92% | |||
8 | E Seichter-P Urbański,*-E Poselt | 15 | WE | 2![]() | W | ![]() | -4 | -200 | 0.81% | 47.58% | ||
E Seichter-P Urbański,*-E Poselt | 16 | WE | 2![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | +140 | 71.06% | 49.05% | |||
9 | E Seichter-*,E Poselt-P Urbański | 17 | NS | 3![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +430 | 6.25% | 46.53% | ||
E Seichter-*,E Poselt-P Urbański | 18 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | -3 | +150 | 100.00% | 49.50% | |||
10 | M Graczkowski-*,J Jurski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 21 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | +1 | +650 | 100.00% | 52.16% | ||
M Graczkowski-*,J Jurski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 22 | NS | 3![]() | W | ![]() | -3 | +300 | 100.00% | 54.55% | |||
11 | *-J Jurski,M Graczkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 23 | NS | 2![]() | S | ![]() | +2 | +170 | 62.50% | 54.93% | ||
*-J Jurski,M Graczkowski-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 24 | NS | 4![]() | N | ![]() | -1 | -50 | 12.50% | 53.00% | |||
12 | J Jurski-M Graczkowski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 19 | WE | 5![]() | S | ![]() | -4 | +800 | 100.00% | 55.04% | ||
J Jurski-M Graczkowski,*-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 20 | WE | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +1 | -130 | 87.50% | 56.40% | |||
13 | *-J Kowalski,T Borucki-R Jaworski | 25 | NS | 3![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -630 | 7.81% | 54.45% | ||
*-J Kowalski,T Borucki-R Jaworski | 26 | NS | 3![]() | N | ![]() | +2 | +660 | 50.00% | 54.28% | |||
14 | R Jaworski-*,T Borucki-J Kowalski | 27 | NS | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +1 | -690 | 0.00% | 52.27% | ||
R Jaworski-*,T Borucki-J Kowalski | 28 | NS | 4![]() | S | ![]() | -2 | -200 | 6.25% | 50.63% | |||
15 | J Kowalski-R Jaworski,T Borucki-* | 29 | WE | 4![]() | E | ![]() | +2 | +680 | 50.00% | 50.61% | ||
J Kowalski-R Jaworski,T Borucki-* | 30 | WE | 3![]() | S | ![]() | -1 | +50 | 62.50% | 51.00% | |||
SUMA: | 51.00% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 51.00% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 19 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2018-05-03 o 21:55:48