Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Okręgu K-PZBS 2019 8: M Grabowski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | A Wujków-K Ligęza,R Borgula-* | 5 | WE | 2 | N | 2 | = | -90 | 22.73% | 22.73% | ||
A Wujków-K Ligęza,R Borgula-* | 6 | WE | 3 | W | K | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 36.36% | |||
2 | T Borucki-A Majchrzak,E Seichter-* | 3 | WE | 3 | N | J | = | -400 | 36.36% | 36.36% | ||
T Borucki-A Majchrzak,E Seichter-* | 4 | WE | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | +680 | 40.91% | 37.50% | |||
3 | A Krzemińska-J Golimowski,P Krzemiński-* | 1 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | -1 | +50 | 59.09% | 41.82% | ||
A Krzemińska-J Golimowski,P Krzemiński-* | 2 | WE | 6 | W | 2 | = | +990 | 86.36% | 49.24% | |||
4 | J Jurski-B Zieliński,T Żurek-* | 9 | WE | 6 | E | K | -1 | -100 | 54.55% | 50.00% | ||
J Jurski-B Zieliński,T Żurek-* | 10 | WE | 5× | N | 5 | -2 | +500 | 68.18% | 52.27% | |||
5 | P Litwin-G Prusak,T Szwenkel-* | 7 | WE | 2× | E | 6 | -3 | -800 | 13.64% | 47.98% | ||
P Litwin-G Prusak,T Szwenkel-* | 8 | WE | 1 | W | J | -1 | -50 | 72.73% | 50.45% | |||
6 | A Wujków-*,Z Zachwieja-K Ligęza | 15 | NS | 3 | W | 5 | +1 | -430 | 95.45% | 54.55% | ||
A Wujków-*,Z Zachwieja-K Ligęza | 16 | NS | 6 | N | 5 | = | +980 | 81.82% | 56.82% | |||
7 | P Litwin-*,B Pliszka-G Prusak | 11 | NS | 2 | S | 10 | +1 | +140 | 81.82% | 58.74% | ||
P Litwin-*,B Pliszka-G Prusak | 12 | NS | 4 | S | A | = | +620 | 22.73% | 56.17% | |||
8 | J Jurski-*,M Dolny-B Zieliński | 17 | NS | 3 | E | K | = | -140 | 31.82% | 54.55% | ||
J Jurski-*,M Dolny-B Zieliński | 18 | NS | 4 | E | 7 | +2 | -480 | 36.36% | 53.41% | |||
9 | A Krzemińska-*,A Lewandowski-J Golimowski | 13 | NS | 3 | E | A | +2 | -200 | 50.00% | 53.21% | ||
A Krzemińska-*,A Lewandowski-J Golimowski | 14 | NS | 3 | W | A | -5 | +250 | 63.64% | 53.79% | |||
10 | T Borucki-*,Z Witt-A Majchrzak | 19 | NS | 2 | W | 4 | +1 | -140 | 9.09% | 51.44% | ||
T Borucki-*,Z Witt-A Majchrzak | 20 | NS | 2 | E | 8 | = | -120 | 72.73% | 52.50% | |||
11 | P Krzemiński-E Seichter,T Żurek-* | 21 | WE | 4 | E | A | -1 | -50 | 40.91% | 51.95% | ||
P Krzemiński-E Seichter,T Żurek-* | 22 | WE | 3 | E | A | -1 | -100 | 31.82% | 51.03% | |||
12 | *-T Szwenkel,E Seichter-T Żurek | 23 | NS | 4 | S | 2 | +1 | +650 | 40.91% | 50.59% | ||
*-T Szwenkel,E Seichter-T Żurek | 24 | NS | 4 | N | 2 | -1 | -50 | 18.18% | 49.24% | |||
13 | *-R Mrukowski,- | 23 | NS | AP0 | 60.00% | 49.67% | ||||||
*-R Mrukowski,- | 24 | NS | AP0 | 60.00% | 50.07% | |||||||
14 | E Seichter-*,P Krzemiński-T Szwenkel | 27 | NS | 1 | N | J | +1 | +120 | 54.55% | 50.24% | ||
E Seichter-*,P Krzemiński-T Szwenkel | 28 | NS | 3× | S | K | = | +670 | 100.00% | 52.01% | |||
15 | T Szwenkel-T Żurek,*-P Krzemiński | 29 | WE | 5× | E | K | -2 | -500 | 54.55% | 52.10% | ||
T Szwenkel-T Żurek,*-P Krzemiński | 30 | WE | 4× | N | J | -1 | +100 | 0.00% | 50.36% | |||
SUMA: | 50.36% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 50.36% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 26 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2019-12-15 o 22:42:48