7: H Adamski
rakt
bieżący
A
A
843J46375A94952J738510K26QK| TURNIEJ INDYWIDUALNY POLOPEN 1 7: H Adamski | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | T Rakoczy-J Wawrzyniak,*-E Poselt | 3 | WE | 4 | N | A | +2 | -480 | 20.00% | 20.00% | ||
| T Rakoczy-J Wawrzyniak,*-E Poselt | 4 | WE | 3 | N | A | +2 | -660 | 0.00% | 10.00% | |||
| 2 | M Kojro-G Gralik,*-C Bury | 7 | WE | 4 | N | 8 | -1 | +100 | 80.00% | 33.33% | ||
| M Kojro-G Gralik,*-C Bury | 8 | WE | 3 | S | 4 | = | -400 | 30.00% | 32.50% | |||
| 3 | H Pientka-R Nowicki,*-M Redmann | 1 | WE | 3 | W | 3 | +3 | +490 | 40.00% | 34.00% | ||
| H Pientka-R Nowicki,*-M Redmann | 2 | WE | 2 | E | J | = | +110 | 70.00% | 40.00% | |||
| 4 | R Kurpios-E Kubiak,*-H Jeliński | 5 | WE | 3 | W | 4 | +3 | +490 | 50.00% | 41.43% | ||
| R Kurpios-E Kubiak,*-H Jeliński | 6 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | -2 | +100 | 90.00% | 47.50% | |||
| 5 | E Rogacka-K Ligęza,*-Z Zachwieja | 9 | WE | 4 | S | 3 | = | -420 | 40.00% | 46.67% | ||
| E Rogacka-K Ligęza,*-Z Zachwieja | 10 | WE | 3 | W | 7 | -2 | -200 | 0.00% | 42.00% | |||
| 6 | T Rakoczy-*,M Dolny-J Wawrzyniak | 13 | NS | 4 | N | 5 | = | +620 | 70.00% | 44.55% | ||
| T Rakoczy-*,M Dolny-J Wawrzyniak | 14 | NS | 2 | S | A | +1 | +140 | 100.00% | 49.17% | |||
| 7 | H Pientka-*,J Nawrocki-G Gralik | 19 | NS | 1 | E | 9 | = | -90 | 0.00% | 45.38% | ||
| H Pientka-*,J Nawrocki-G Gralik | 20 | NS | 3 | W | 4 | -1 | +100 | 80.00% | 47.86% | |||
| 8 | E Rogacka-*,M Graczkowski-R Nowicki | 15 | NS | 3 | S | 9 | -1 | -100 | 80.00% | 50.00% | ||
| E Rogacka-*,M Graczkowski-R Nowicki | 16 | NS | 6 | S | 5 | = | +980 | 80.00% | 51.88% | |||
| 9 | M Kojro-*,M Jankowski-E Kubiak | 11 | NS | 1 | S | 2 | +1 | +120 | 70.00% | 52.94% | ||
| M Kojro-*,M Jankowski-E Kubiak | 12 | NS | 2 | W | J | -2 | +100 | 90.00% | 55.00% | |||
| 10 | R Kurpios-*,A Kozłowski-K Ligęza | 17 | NS | 3 | E | 7 | = | -110 | 70.00% | 55.79% | ||
| R Kurpios-*,A Kozłowski-K Ligęza | 18 | NS | 4 | N | 3 | +2 | +680 | 90.00% | 57.50% | |||
| 11 | *-B Drews,Z Witt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 21 | NS | 6 | W | 8 | +1 | -1010 | 60.00% | 57.62% | ||
| *-B Drews,Z Witt-M Bajerska-Wasilius | 22 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | -3 | -150 | 40.00% | 56.82% | |||
| 12 | *-,- | 27 | NS | AP0 | 60.36% | 56.97% | ||||||
| *-,- | 28 | NS | AP0 | 60.36% | 57.11% | |||||||
| 13 | Z Witt-*,Z Diakowska-B Drews | 25 | NS | 2 | W | 10 | -1 | +100 | 70.00% | 57.63% | ||
| Z Witt-*,Z Diakowska-B Drews | 26 | NS | 4 | W | K | -1 | +100 | 90.00% | 58.87% | |||
| 14 | B Drews-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-Z Diakowska | 27 | WE | 1 | N | 2 | +1 | -120 | 80.00% | 59.66% | ||
| B Drews-M Bajerska-Wasilius,*-Z Diakowska | 28 | WE | 4 | S | 6 | = | -620 | 80.00% | 60.38% | |||
| 15 | Z Diakowska-Z Witt,M Bajerska-Wasilius-* | 29 | WE | 2 | N | Q | +1 | -140 | 60.00% | 60.37% | ||
| Z Diakowska-Z Witt,M Bajerska-Wasilius-* | 30 | WE | 4 | E | K | = | +130 | 60.00% | 60.36% | |||
| SUMA: | 60.36% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 60.36% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 3 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.22 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2019-11-08 o 22:35:59