| Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 22: M Dolny | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | *-R Jaworski,B Drews-G Rojewski | 7 | NS | 3![]() | E | 2 | -3 | +300 | 72.22% | 72.22% | ||
| *-R Jaworski,B Drews-G Rojewski | 8 | NS | 1![]() | S | Q | -1 | -50 | 16.67% | 44.44% | |||
| 2 | *-B Drews,G Rojewski-R Jaworski | 9 | NS | 3![]() | N | 6 | +2 | +460 | 83.33% | 57.41% | ||
| *-B Drews,G Rojewski-R Jaworski | 10 | NS | 4![]() | W | 5 | -2 | +200 | 66.67% | 59.72% | |||
| 3 | *-G Rojewski,R Jaworski-B Drews | 11 | NS | 3![]() | N | 9 | -1 | -50 | 0.00% | 47.78% | ||
| *-G Rojewski,R Jaworski-B Drews | 12 | NS | 4![]() | S | 3 | +1 | +150 | 66.67% | 50.93% | |||
| 4 | *-B Nalazek,M Grużewski-P Mizak | 13 | NS | 2![]() | N | 10 | -3 | -300 | 5.56% | 44.44% | ||
| *-B Nalazek,M Grużewski-P Mizak | 14 | NS | 5 × | S | Q | -1 | -100 | 5.56% | 39.58% | |||
| 5 | *-M Grużewski,P Mizak-B Nalazek | 15 | NS | 4![]() | E | 10 | = | -420 | 11.11% | 36.42% | ||
| *-M Grużewski,P Mizak-B Nalazek | 16 | NS | 3![]() | N | K | +1 | +430 | 66.67% | 39.44% | |||
| 6 | *-P Mizak,B Nalazek-M Grużewski | 17 | NS | 3![]() | W | A | -2 | +100 | 66.67% | 41.92% | ||
| *-P Mizak,B Nalazek-M Grużewski | 18 | NS | 4![]() | E | K | -2 | +100 | 77.78% | 44.91% | |||
| 7 | *-J Jurski,R Kowalkowski-J Łakomy | 19 | NS | 2 × | S | 7 | +1 | +570 | 94.44% | 48.72% | ||
| *-J Jurski,R Kowalkowski-J Łakomy | 20 | NS | 1![]() | E | 6 | -1 | +100 | 55.56% | 49.21% | |||
| 8 | *-R Kowalkowski,J Łakomy-J Jurski | 21 | NS | 3![]() | S | 3 | = | +110 | 77.78% | 51.11% | ||
| *-R Kowalkowski,J Łakomy-J Jurski | 22 | NS | 3![]() | E | 2 | -3 | +300 | 100.00% | 54.17% | |||
| 9 | *-J Łakomy,J Jurski-R Kowalkowski | 23 | NS | 4![]() | W | A | -1 | +100 | 66.67% | 54.90% | ||
| *-J Łakomy,J Jurski-R Kowalkowski | 24 | NS | 2![]() | W | 5 | +2 | -170 | 16.67% | 52.78% | |||
| 10 | *-A Ciechacki,J Siwczyński-E Seichter | 25 | NS | 3![]() | E | 2 | = | -600 | 72.22% | 53.80% | ||
| *-A Ciechacki,J Siwczyński-E Seichter | 26 | NS | 6![]() | E | 6 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 56.11% | |||
| 11 | *-J Siwczyński,E Seichter-A Ciechacki | 27 | NS | 5 × | E | 9 | -3 | +500 | 100.00% | 58.20% | ||
| *-J Siwczyński,E Seichter-A Ciechacki | 28 | NS | 3 × | N | 9 | = | +730 | 83.33% | 59.34% | |||
| 12 | *-E Seichter,A Ciechacki-J Siwczyński | 29 | NS | 3![]() | N | 3 | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 58.94% | ||
| *-E Seichter,A Ciechacki-J Siwczyński | 30 | NS | 3![]() | W | 7 | +2 | -460 | 22.22% | 57.41% | |||
| 13 | *-L Hejne,M Krakowiak-E Krawczyk | 1 | NS | 3![]() | N | 2 | +2 | +460 | 77.78% | 58.22% | ||
| *-L Hejne,M Krakowiak-E Krawczyk | 2 | NS | 3 × | N | K | -2 | -500 | 0.00% | 55.98% | |||
| 14 | *-M Krakowiak,E Krawczyk-L Hejne | 3 | NS | 4 × | N | K | -3 | -500 | 5.56% | 54.12% | ||
| *-M Krakowiak,E Krawczyk-L Hejne | 4 | NS | 2![]() | E | 6 | +3 | -150 | 88.89% | 55.36% | |||
| 15 | *-E Krawczyk,L Hejne-M Krakowiak | 5 | NS | 3![]() | S | 6 | -1 | -100 | 16.67% | 54.02% | ||
| *-E Krawczyk,L Hejne-M Krakowiak | 6 | NS | 6![]() | W | A | +1 | -1390 | 0.00% | 52.22% | |||
| SUMA: | 52.22% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 52.22% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 11 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42