Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 23: M Bielski | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | *-J Jurski,M Krakowiak-E Seichter | 13 | NS | 2 | N | 4 | -1 | -100 | 88.89% | 88.89% | ||
*-J Jurski,M Krakowiak-E Seichter | 14 | NS | 4 | S | Q | = | +130 | 77.78% | 83.33% | |||
2 | *-M Krakowiak,E Seichter-J Jurski | 15 | NS | 5× | E | K | -1 | +100 | 77.78% | 81.48% | ||
*-M Krakowiak,E Seichter-J Jurski | 16 | NS | 3 | S | J | +1 | +430 | 66.67% | 77.78% | |||
3 | *-E Seichter,J Jurski-M Krakowiak | 17 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | +1 | -150 | 22.22% | 66.67% | ||
*-E Seichter,J Jurski-M Krakowiak | 18 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | -1 | +50 | 38.89% | 62.04% | |||
4 | *-A Ciechacki,B Drews-E Krawczyk | 19 | NS | 4 | S | J | -1 | -50 | 44.44% | 59.52% | ||
*-A Ciechacki,B Drews-E Krawczyk | 20 | NS | 1 | N | 3 | = | +90 | 11.11% | 53.47% | |||
5 | *-B Drews,E Krawczyk-A Ciechacki | 21 | NS | 3 | N | K | +1 | +130 | 94.44% | 58.02% | ||
*-B Drews,E Krawczyk-A Ciechacki | 22 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | = | -600 | 11.11% | 53.33% | |||
6 | *-E Krawczyk,A Ciechacki-B Drews | 23 | NS | 3 | E | Q | +2 | -150 | 22.22% | 50.51% | ||
*-E Krawczyk,A Ciechacki-B Drews | 24 | NS | 1 | W | Q | +2 | -140 | 66.67% | 51.85% | |||
7 | *-L Hejne,M Grużewski-G Rojewski | 25 | NS | 3 | W | 2 | = | -600 | 72.22% | 53.42% | ||
*-L Hejne,M Grużewski-G Rojewski | 26 | NS | 3 | E | 6 | +1 | -630 | 88.89% | 55.95% | |||
8 | *-M Grużewski,G Rojewski-L Hejne | 27 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | = | +140 | 33.33% | 54.44% | ||
*-M Grużewski,G Rojewski-L Hejne | 28 | NS | 4× | N | 9 | = | +790 | 100.00% | 57.29% | |||
9 | *-G Rojewski,L Hejne-M Grużewski | 29 | NS | 3 | S | A | +2 | +660 | 100.00% | 59.80% | ||
*-G Rojewski,L Hejne-M Grużewski | 30 | NS | 4 | W | 7 | +1 | -450 | 55.56% | 59.57% | |||
10 | *-R Jaworski,R Kowalkowski-P Mizak | 1 | NS | 3 | S | Q | +1 | +430 | 11.11% | 57.02% | ||
*-R Jaworski,R Kowalkowski-P Mizak | 2 | NS | 3 | E | 10 | -1 | +50 | 72.22% | 57.78% | |||
11 | *-R Kowalkowski,P Mizak-R Jaworski | 3 | NS | 2 | N | K | = | +110 | 88.89% | 59.26% | ||
*-R Kowalkowski,P Mizak-R Jaworski | 4 | NS | 3 | W | Q | +1 | -630 | 16.67% | 57.32% | |||
12 | *-P Mizak,R Jaworski-R Kowalkowski | 5 | NS | 3 | S | 2 | +1 | +630 | 77.78% | 58.21% | ||
*-P Mizak,R Jaworski-R Kowalkowski | 6 | NS | 5 | W | 8 | = | -600 | 38.89% | 57.41% | |||
13 | *-B Nalazek,J Siwczyński-J Łakomy | 7 | NS | 4× | N | J | = | +790 | 100.00% | 59.11% | ||
*-B Nalazek,J Siwczyński-J Łakomy | 8 | NS | 3 | S | Q | = | +110 | 61.11% | 59.19% | |||
14 | *-J Siwczyński,J Łakomy-B Nalazek | 9 | NS | 3 | S | 7 | +1 | +430 | 50.00% | 58.85% | ||
*-J Siwczyński,J Łakomy-B Nalazek | 10 | NS | 4 | W | Q | -2 | +200 | 66.67% | 59.13% | |||
15 | *-J Łakomy,B Nalazek-J Siwczyński | 11 | NS | 3× | W | 5 | -3 | +500 | 88.89% | 60.15% | ||
*-J Łakomy,B Nalazek-J Siwczyński | 12 | NS | 4 | S | J | +1 | +150 | 66.67% | 60.37% | |||
SUMA: | 60.37% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 60.37% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 3 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42