Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 27: B Drews | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | M Dolny-R Jaworski,*-G Rojewski | 7 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | -3 | -300 | 27.78% | 27.78% | ||
M Dolny-R Jaworski,*-G Rojewski | 8 | WE | 1 | S | Q | -1 | +50 | 83.33% | 55.56% | |||
2 | M Dolny-*,G Rojewski-R Jaworski | 9 | NS | 3 | N | 6 | +2 | +460 | 83.33% | 64.81% | ||
M Dolny-*,G Rojewski-R Jaworski | 10 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | -2 | +200 | 66.67% | 65.28% | |||
3 | M Dolny-G Rojewski,R Jaworski-* | 11 | WE | 3 | N | 9 | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 72.22% | ||
M Dolny-G Rojewski,R Jaworski-* | 12 | WE | 4 | S | 3 | +1 | -150 | 33.33% | 65.74% | |||
4 | M Bielski-A Ciechacki,*-E Krawczyk | 19 | WE | 4 | S | J | -1 | +50 | 55.56% | 64.29% | ||
M Bielski-A Ciechacki,*-E Krawczyk | 20 | WE | 1 | N | 3 | = | -90 | 88.89% | 67.36% | |||
5 | M Bielski-*,E Krawczyk-A Ciechacki | 21 | NS | 3 | N | K | +1 | +130 | 94.44% | 70.37% | ||
M Bielski-*,E Krawczyk-A Ciechacki | 22 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | = | -600 | 11.11% | 64.44% | |||
6 | M Bielski-E Krawczyk,A Ciechacki-* | 23 | WE | 3 | E | Q | +2 | +150 | 77.78% | 65.66% | ||
M Bielski-E Krawczyk,A Ciechacki-* | 24 | WE | 1 | W | Q | +2 | +140 | 33.33% | 62.96% | |||
7 | A Seichter-B Nalazek,*-E Seichter | 1 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | +2 | -460 | 22.22% | 59.83% | ||
A Seichter-B Nalazek,*-E Seichter | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 3 | -1 | -50 | 27.78% | 57.54% | |||
8 | A Seichter-*,E Seichter-B Nalazek | 3 | NS | 4 | E | 8 | -1 | +100 | 66.67% | 58.15% | ||
A Seichter-*,E Seichter-B Nalazek | 4 | NS | 3 | E | Q | = | -110 | 100.00% | 60.76% | |||
9 | A Seichter-E Seichter,B Nalazek-* | 5 | WE | 3 | N | K | +1 | -630 | 22.22% | 58.50% | ||
A Seichter-E Seichter,B Nalazek-* | 6 | WE | 5 | W | 8 | = | +600 | 61.11% | 58.64% | |||
10 | P Pawełkiewicz-L Hejne,*-J Łakomy | 13 | WE | 3 | S | A | -1 | +100 | 11.11% | 56.14% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-L Hejne,*-J Łakomy | 14 | WE | 4 | E | A | -2 | -100 | 44.44% | 55.56% | |||
11 | P Pawełkiewicz-*,J Łakomy-L Hejne | 15 | NS | 4 | W | A | = | -420 | 11.11% | 53.44% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-*,J Łakomy-L Hejne | 16 | NS | 3 | S | 5 | +1 | +430 | 66.67% | 54.04% | |||
12 | P Pawełkiewicz-J Łakomy,L Hejne-* | 17 | WE | 4×× | W | 3 | -4 | -1600 | 0.00% | 51.69% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-J Łakomy,L Hejne-* | 18 | WE | 4 | E | A | -2 | -100 | 22.22% | 50.46% | |||
13 | B Podgajny-J Jurski,*-P Mizak | 25 | WE | 3 | E | 6 | +1 | +630 | 72.22% | 51.33% | ||
B Podgajny-J Jurski,*-P Mizak | 26 | WE | 6 | W | K | = | +1370 | 94.44% | 52.99% | |||
14 | B Podgajny-*,P Mizak-J Jurski | 27 | NS | 2 | N | K | +2 | +170 | 55.56% | 53.09% | ||
B Podgajny-*,P Mizak-J Jurski | 28 | NS | 4× | E | K | = | -590 | 11.11% | 51.59% | |||
15 | B Podgajny-P Mizak,J Jurski-* | 29 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | -2 | +200 | 72.22% | 52.30% | ||
B Podgajny-P Mizak,J Jurski-* | 30 | WE | 4 | W | 7 | +1 | +450 | 44.44% | 52.04% | |||
SUMA: | 52.04% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 52.04% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 12 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42