| Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 28: M Krakowiak | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | M Bielski-J Jurski,*-E Seichter | 13 | WE | 2![]() | N | 4 | -1 | +100 | 11.11% | 11.11% | ||
| M Bielski-J Jurski,*-E Seichter | 14 | WE | 4![]() | S | Q | = | -130 | 22.22% | 16.67% | |||
| 2 | M Bielski-*,E Seichter-J Jurski | 15 | NS | 5 × | E | K | -1 | +100 | 77.78% | 37.04% | ||
| M Bielski-*,E Seichter-J Jurski | 16 | NS | 3![]() | S | J | +1 | +430 | 66.67% | 44.44% | |||
| 3 | M Bielski-E Seichter,J Jurski-* | 17 | WE | 2![]() | E | 5 | +1 | +150 | 77.78% | 51.11% | ||
| M Bielski-E Seichter,J Jurski-* | 18 | WE | 4![]() | W | 5 | -1 | -50 | 61.11% | 52.78% | |||
| 4 | A Seichter-R Jaworski,*-J Łakomy | 25 | WE | 3![]() | E | 6 | = | +600 | 27.78% | 49.21% | ||
| A Seichter-R Jaworski,*-J Łakomy | 26 | WE | 6![]() | W | K | = | +1370 | 94.44% | 54.86% | |||
| 5 | A Seichter-*,J Łakomy-R Jaworski | 27 | NS | 2![]() | N | 6 | +2 | +170 | 55.56% | 54.94% | ||
| A Seichter-*,J Łakomy-R Jaworski | 28 | NS | 2![]() | S | J | +2 | +180 | 66.67% | 56.11% | |||
| 6 | A Seichter-J Łakomy,R Jaworski-* | 29 | WE | 3![]() | N | 5 | -4 | +400 | 100.00% | 60.10% | ||
| A Seichter-J Łakomy,R Jaworski-* | 30 | WE | 4 × | N | A | -5 | +1100 | 100.00% | 63.43% | |||
| 7 | P Pawełkiewicz-A Ciechacki,*-P Mizak | 7 | WE | 4![]() | W | 7 | = | +620 | 100.00% | 66.24% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-A Ciechacki,*-P Mizak | 8 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | -1 | +50 | 83.33% | 67.46% | |||
| 8 | P Pawełkiewicz-*,P Mizak-A Ciechacki | 9 | NS | 6![]() | S | 8 | -1 | -50 | 16.67% | 64.07% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-*,P Mizak-A Ciechacki | 10 | NS | 4![]() | W | Q | -1 | +100 | 11.11% | 60.76% | |||
| 9 | P Pawełkiewicz-P Mizak,A Ciechacki-* | 11 | WE | 3 × | N | 5 | = | -550 | 0.00% | 57.19% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-P Mizak,A Ciechacki-* | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | -2 | -100 | 66.67% | 57.72% | |||
| 10 | B Podgajny-B Nalazek,*-G Rojewski | 19 | WE | 3![]() | N | 8 | -4 | +200 | 94.44% | 59.65% | ||
| B Podgajny-B Nalazek,*-G Rojewski | 20 | WE | 1![]() | S | 4 | +1 | -110 | 5.56% | 56.94% | |||
| 11 | B Podgajny-*,G Rojewski-B Nalazek | 21 | NS | 3![]() | N | K | -2 | -200 | 38.89% | 56.08% | ||
| B Podgajny-*,G Rojewski-B Nalazek | 22 | NS | 3 × | S | A | -3 | -500 | 33.33% | 55.05% | |||
| 12 | B Podgajny-G Rojewski,B Nalazek-* | 23 | WE | 3![]() | E | Q | +2 | +150 | 77.78% | 56.04% | ||
| B Podgajny-G Rojewski,B Nalazek-* | 24 | WE | 2![]() | W | Q | +1 | +140 | 33.33% | 55.09% | |||
| 13 | M Dolny-L Hejne,*-E Krawczyk | 1 | WE | 3![]() | N | 2 | +2 | -460 | 22.22% | 53.78% | ||
| M Dolny-L Hejne,*-E Krawczyk | 2 | WE | 3 × | N | K | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 55.56% | |||
| 14 | M Dolny-*,E Krawczyk-L Hejne | 3 | NS | 4 × | N | K | -3 | -500 | 5.56% | 53.70% | ||
| M Dolny-*,E Krawczyk-L Hejne | 4 | NS | 2![]() | E | 6 | +3 | -150 | 88.89% | 54.96% | |||
| 15 | M Dolny-E Krawczyk,L Hejne-* | 5 | WE | 3![]() | S | 6 | -1 | +100 | 83.33% | 55.94% | ||
| M Dolny-E Krawczyk,L Hejne-* | 6 | WE | 6![]() | W | A | +1 | +1390 | 100.00% | 57.41% | |||
| SUMA: | 57.41% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 57.41% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 5 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42