| Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 31: A Ciechacki | ||||||||||||
| runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
| NS | WE | |||||||||||
| 1 | B Podgajny-*,M Grużewski-J Łakomy | 1 | NS | 6 × | S | Q | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 0.00% | ||
| B Podgajny-*,M Grużewski-J Łakomy | 2 | NS | 3![]() | W | 10 | = | -400 | 16.67% | 8.33% | |||
| 2 | B Podgajny-M Grużewski,J Łakomy-* | 3 | WE | 3 × | N | K | -1 | +100 | 61.11% | 25.93% | ||
| B Podgajny-M Grużewski,J Łakomy-* | 4 | WE | 3![]() | W | 6 | +1 | +630 | 83.33% | 40.28% | |||
| 3 | B Podgajny-J Łakomy,*-M Grużewski | 5 | WE | 5 × | N | 3 | -2 | +500 | 100.00% | 52.22% | ||
| B Podgajny-J Łakomy,*-M Grużewski | 6 | WE | 2![]() | E | 9 | +2 | +170 | 33.33% | 49.07% | |||
| 4 | M Bielski-*,B Drews-E Krawczyk | 19 | NS | 4![]() | S | J | -1 | -50 | 44.44% | 48.41% | ||
| M Bielski-*,B Drews-E Krawczyk | 20 | NS | 1![]() | N | 3 | = | +90 | 11.11% | 43.75% | |||
| 5 | M Bielski-B Drews,E Krawczyk-* | 21 | WE | 3![]() | N | K | +1 | -130 | 5.56% | 39.51% | ||
| M Bielski-B Drews,E Krawczyk-* | 22 | WE | 3![]() | E | 5 | = | +600 | 88.89% | 44.44% | |||
| 6 | M Bielski-E Krawczyk,*-B Drews | 23 | WE | 3![]() | E | Q | +2 | +150 | 77.78% | 47.47% | ||
| M Bielski-E Krawczyk,*-B Drews | 24 | WE | 1![]() | W | Q | +2 | +140 | 33.33% | 46.30% | |||
| 7 | P Pawełkiewicz-*,M Krakowiak-P Mizak | 7 | NS | 4![]() | W | 7 | = | -620 | 0.00% | 42.74% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-*,M Krakowiak-P Mizak | 8 | NS | 3![]() | N | 3 | -1 | -50 | 16.67% | 40.87% | |||
| 8 | P Pawełkiewicz-M Krakowiak,P Mizak-* | 9 | WE | 6![]() | S | 8 | -1 | +50 | 83.33% | 43.70% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-M Krakowiak,P Mizak-* | 10 | WE | 4![]() | W | Q | -1 | -100 | 88.89% | 46.53% | |||
| 9 | P Pawełkiewicz-P Mizak,*-M Krakowiak | 11 | WE | 3 × | N | 5 | = | -550 | 0.00% | 43.79% | ||
| P Pawełkiewicz-P Mizak,*-M Krakowiak | 12 | WE | 4![]() | E | A | -2 | -100 | 66.67% | 45.06% | |||
| 10 | M Dolny-*,J Siwczyński-E Seichter | 25 | NS | 3![]() | E | 2 | = | -600 | 72.22% | 46.49% | ||
| M Dolny-*,J Siwczyński-E Seichter | 26 | NS | 6![]() | E | 6 | -1 | +100 | 100.00% | 49.17% | |||
| 11 | M Dolny-J Siwczyński,E Seichter-* | 27 | WE | 5 × | E | 9 | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 46.83% | ||
| M Dolny-J Siwczyński,E Seichter-* | 28 | WE | 3 × | N | 9 | = | -730 | 16.67% | 45.45% | |||
| 12 | M Dolny-E Seichter,*-J Siwczyński | 29 | WE | 3![]() | N | 3 | -1 | +100 | 50.00% | 45.65% | ||
| M Dolny-E Seichter,*-J Siwczyński | 30 | WE | 3![]() | W | 7 | +2 | +460 | 77.78% | 46.99% | |||
| 13 | A Seichter-*,R Kowalkowski-G Rojewski | 13 | NS | 3![]() | S | A | -2 | -200 | 38.89% | 46.67% | ||
| A Seichter-*,R Kowalkowski-G Rojewski | 14 | NS | 4![]() | S | 8 | -1 | -50 | 22.22% | 45.73% | |||
| 14 | A Seichter-R Kowalkowski,G Rojewski-* | 15 | WE | 4![]() | E | K | = | +420 | 88.89% | 47.33% | ||
| A Seichter-R Kowalkowski,G Rojewski-* | 16 | WE | 3![]() | S | J | = | -400 | 83.33% | 48.61% | |||
| 15 | A Seichter-G Rojewski,*-R Kowalkowski | 17 | WE | 4![]() | W | K | -2 | -100 | 33.33% | 48.08% | ||
| A Seichter-G Rojewski,*-R Kowalkowski | 18 | WE | 4![]() | W | 6 | -1 | -50 | 61.11% | 48.52% | |||
| SUMA: | 48.52% | |||||||||||
| ±: | ||||||||||||
| WYNIK: | 48.52% | |||||||||||
| MIEJSCE: | 23 | |||||||||||
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42