Indywidualne Mistrzostwa Województwa K-P 38: E Seichter | ||||||||||||
runda | przeciwnicy | rozd. | linia | kont rakt | gra | wist | lew | zapis | % | wynik bieżący | ||
NS | WE | |||||||||||
1 | M Bielski-J Jurski,M Krakowiak-* | 13 | WE | 2 | N | 4 | -1 | +100 | 11.11% | 11.11% | ||
M Bielski-J Jurski,M Krakowiak-* | 14 | WE | 4 | S | Q | = | -130 | 22.22% | 16.67% | |||
2 | M Bielski-M Krakowiak,*-J Jurski | 15 | WE | 5× | E | K | -1 | -100 | 22.22% | 18.52% | ||
M Bielski-M Krakowiak,*-J Jurski | 16 | WE | 3 | S | J | +1 | -430 | 33.33% | 22.22% | |||
3 | M Bielski-*,J Jurski-M Krakowiak | 17 | NS | 2 | E | 5 | +1 | -150 | 22.22% | 22.22% | ||
M Bielski-*,J Jurski-M Krakowiak | 18 | NS | 4 | W | 5 | -1 | +50 | 38.89% | 25.00% | |||
4 | B Podgajny-L Hejne,R Kowalkowski-* | 7 | WE | 3 | E | Q | -2 | -200 | 55.56% | 29.37% | ||
B Podgajny-L Hejne,R Kowalkowski-* | 8 | WE | 2 | N | 3 | = | -110 | 38.89% | 30.56% | |||
5 | B Podgajny-R Kowalkowski,*-L Hejne | 9 | WE | 3 | N | 5 | +2 | -460 | 16.67% | 29.01% | ||
B Podgajny-R Kowalkowski,*-L Hejne | 10 | WE | 4 | W | Q | -2 | -200 | 33.33% | 29.44% | |||
6 | B Podgajny-*,L Hejne-R Kowalkowski | 11 | NS | 3 | S | 4 | +2 | +150 | 22.22% | 28.79% | ||
B Podgajny-*,L Hejne-R Kowalkowski | 12 | NS | 5× | S | 9 | = | +750 | 100.00% | 34.72% | |||
7 | A Seichter-B Nalazek,B Drews-* | 1 | WE | 3 | S | 6 | +2 | -460 | 22.22% | 33.76% | ||
A Seichter-B Nalazek,B Drews-* | 2 | WE | 3 | E | 3 | -1 | -50 | 27.78% | 33.33% | |||
8 | A Seichter-B Drews,*-B Nalazek | 3 | WE | 4 | E | 8 | -1 | -100 | 33.33% | 33.33% | ||
A Seichter-B Drews,*-B Nalazek | 4 | WE | 3 | E | Q | = | +110 | 0.00% | 31.25% | |||
9 | A Seichter-*,B Nalazek-B Drews | 5 | NS | 3 | N | K | +1 | +630 | 77.78% | 33.99% | ||
A Seichter-*,B Nalazek-B Drews | 6 | NS | 5 | W | 8 | = | -600 | 38.89% | 34.26% | |||
10 | M Dolny-A Ciechacki,J Siwczyński-* | 25 | WE | 3 | E | 2 | = | +600 | 27.78% | 33.92% | ||
M Dolny-A Ciechacki,J Siwczyński-* | 26 | WE | 6 | E | 6 | -1 | -100 | 0.00% | 32.22% | |||
11 | M Dolny-J Siwczyński,*-A Ciechacki | 27 | WE | 5× | E | 9 | -3 | -500 | 0.00% | 30.69% | ||
M Dolny-J Siwczyński,*-A Ciechacki | 28 | WE | 3× | N | 9 | = | -730 | 16.67% | 30.05% | |||
12 | M Dolny-*,A Ciechacki-J Siwczyński | 29 | NS | 3 | N | 3 | -1 | -100 | 50.00% | 30.92% | ||
M Dolny-*,A Ciechacki-J Siwczyński | 30 | NS | 3 | W | 7 | +2 | -460 | 22.22% | 30.56% | |||
13 | P Pawełkiewicz-R Jaworski,M Grużewski-* | 19 | WE | 2 | N | 9 | +1 | -140 | 33.33% | 30.67% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-R Jaworski,M Grużewski-* | 20 | WE | 2 | E | 2 | -1 | -100 | 44.44% | 31.20% | |||
14 | P Pawełkiewicz-M Grużewski,*-R Jaworski | 21 | WE | 3 | N | K | -2 | +200 | 61.11% | 32.30% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-M Grużewski,*-R Jaworski | 22 | WE | 2 | E | 6 | +1 | +150 | 44.44% | 32.74% | |||
15 | P Pawełkiewicz-*,R Jaworski-M Grużewski | 23 | NS | 3 | E | 5 | +1 | -130 | 50.00% | 33.33% | ||
P Pawełkiewicz-*,R Jaworski-M Grużewski | 24 | NS | 4 | W | Q | -1 | +50 | 100.00% | 35.56% | |||
SUMA: | 35.56% | |||||||||||
±: | ||||||||||||
WYNIK: | 35.56% | |||||||||||
MIEJSCE: | 40 |
Pary.4.1.0.23 ©Jan Romański'2005, strona wygenerowana 2024-12-28 o 19:41:42